The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading
Open accessAbstract
AutoDock Vina, a new program for molecular docking and virtual screening, is presented. AutoDock Vina achieves an approximately two orders of magnitude speed‐up compared with the molecular docking software previously developed in our lab (AutoDock 4), while also significantly improving the accuracy of the binding mode predictions, judging by our tests on the training set used in AutoDock 4 development. Further speed‐up is achieved from parallelism, by using multithreading on multicore machines. AutoDock Vina automatically calculates the grid maps and clusters the results in a way transparent to the user. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“each of four different vitamins (riboflavin, biotin, thiamine, and folate) were docked into the binding pocket of MMSYN1_0877.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 26,294
Self-citationA new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Braun, W. J., & Murdoch, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 14,099
Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b98874 · Cited by 9,563
Abagyan, R. A., Totrov, M. M., & Kuznetsov, D. (1994) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540150503 · Cited by 1,718
The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review
Gilson, M. K., Given, J. A., Bush, B. L., & McCammon, J. A. (1997) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(97)78756-3 · Cited by 1,222
Wang, R., Lai, L., & Wang, S. (2002) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1016357811882 · Cited by 1,185
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Vanopdenbosch N., 1985, J Mol Graph, 3, 110
- Austern M. H., 1999, Generic Programming and the STL
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,093 of 1,093
Discovery of High-Affinity Noncovalent Allosteric KRAS Inhibitors That Disrupt Effector Binding
McCarthy, M. J., Pagba, C. V., Prakash, P., Naji, A. K., van der Hoeven, D., Liang, H., Gupta, A. K., Zhou, Y., Cho, K.-J., Hancock, J. F., et al. (2019) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b03308 · Cited by 90
Xu, M., Ran, T., & Chen, H. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01494 · Cited by 85
Louisse, J., Dellafiora, L., van den Heuvel, J. J. M. W., Rijkers, D., Leenders, L., Dorne, J.-L. C. M., Punt, A., Russel, F. G. M., & Koenderink, J. B. (2023) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03428-6 · Cited by 84
Artificial intelligence for drug discovery and development in Alzheimer's disease
Qiu, Y., & Cheng, F. (2024) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102776 · Cited by 83
Head, S. A., Shi, W. Q., Yang, E. J., Nacev, B. A., Hong, S. Y., Pasunooti, K. K., Li, R.-J., Shim, J. S., & Liu, J. O. (2017) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.6b00849 · Cited by 82
Heme and hemoglobin utilization by Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Mitra, A., Ko, Y.-H., Cingolani, G., & Niederweis, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12109-5 · Cited by 81
Uni-Mol: A Universal 3D Molecular Representation Learning Framework
Zhou, G., Gao, Z., Ding, Q., Zheng, H., Xu, H., Wei, Z., Zhang, L., & Ke, G. (2022) · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-jjm0j · Cited by 81
Thomas, M., Smith, R. T., O’Boyle, N. M., de Graaf, C., & Bender, A. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-021-00516-0 · Cited by 78
“Lastly, Boitreaud et al. [55] recently used a novel sampling approach combined with a graph to SELFIES [56] variational autoencoder, where the authors demonstrated the ability to optimize the Vina [34] docking score against Dopamine Receptor D3, while maintaining chemical diversity.”
MethodIdentification of the nicotinamide salvage pathway as a new toxification route for antimetabolites
Buonvicino, D., Mazzola, F., Zamporlini, F., Resta, F., Ranieri, G., Camaioni, E., Muzzi, M., Zecchi, R., Pieraccini, G., Dölle, C., et al. (2018) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.01.012 · Cited by 73
BACE1 molecular docking and anti-Alzheimer’s disease activities of ginsenosides
Choi, R. J., Roy, A., Jung, H. J., Ali, M. Y., Min, B.-S., Park, C. H., Yokozawa, T., Fan, T.-P., Choi, J. S., & Jung, H. A. (2016) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.013 · Cited by 77
Shamsi, A., Mohammad, T., Anwar, S., Alajmi, M. F., Hussain, A., Hassan, M. I., Ahmad, F., & Islam, A. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.134 · Cited by 73
Hybrid Multifunctional Modulators Inhibit Multifaceted Aβ Toxicity and Prevent Mitochondrial Damage
Rajasekhar, K., Mehta, K., & Govindaraju, T. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00033 · Cited by 69
Artificial Intelligence Technologies for COVID-19 De Novo Drug Design
Floresta, G., Zagni, C., Gentile, D., Patamia, V., & Rescifina, A. (2022) · doi:10.20944/preprints202203.0032.v1 · Cited by 67
Explainable Deep Relational Networks for Predicting Compound-Protein Affinities and Contacts
Karimi, M., Wu, D., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y. (2019) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.28.890103 · Cited by 64
Stigliani, J.-L., Bernardes-Génisson, V., Bernadou, J., & Pratviel, G. (2012) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2ob25602a · Cited by 62
Siti Halimatul Munawaroh, H., Gumilar, G. G., Nurjanah, F., Yuliani, G., Aisyah, S., Kurnia, D., Wulandari, A. P., Kurniawan, I., Ningrum, A., Koyande, A. K., et al. (2020) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2020.107666 · Cited by 61
Snodgrass, H. M., Mondal, D., & Lewis, J. C. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c07422 · Cited by 61
Identification of Compounds for Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibition
Li, S., Li, A. J., Travers, J., Xu, T., Sakamuru, S., Klumpp-Thomas, C., Huang, R., & Xia, M. (2021) · SLAS Discovery · doi:10.1177/24725552211030897 · Cited by 60
Cojocaru, C., Samoila, P., & Pascariu, P. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.080 · Cited by 59
Singh, A. K., Kushwaha, P. P., Prajapati, K. S., Shuaib, M., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104185 · Cited by 58
Li, W., Hu, Y., & Bischel, H. N. (2021) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics9030063 · Cited by 53
Insights from incorporating quantum computing into drug design workflows
Lau, B., Emani, P. S., Chapman, J., Yao, L., Lam, T., Merrill, P., Warrell, J., Gerstein, M. B., & Lam, H. Y. K. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac789 · Cited by 54
Kushwaha, P. P., Singh, A. K., Prajapati, K. S., Shuaib, M., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104954 · Cited by 53
Houles, T., Boucher, J., Lavoie, G., MacLeod, G., Lin, S., Angers, S., & Roux, P. P. (2023) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-023-01754-x · Cited by 49
Fan, J., & Papadopoulos, V. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076701 · Cited by 48
Cheng, Y., Jin, U.-H., Davidson, L. A., Chapkin, R. S., Jayaraman, A., Tamamis, P., Orr, A., Allred, C., Denison, M. S., Soshilov, A., et al. (2017) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfw230 · Cited by 48
Cheng, W., Doering, J. A., LaLone, C., & Ng, C. (2021) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfab004 · Cited by 49
On-the-fly QM/MM docking with attracting cavities.
Chaskar, P., Zoete, V., & Röhrig, U. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00406 · Cited by 46
Minic, S., Stanic-Vucinic, D., Radomirovic, M., Radibratovic, M., Milcic, M., Nikolic, M., & Cirkovic Velickovic, T. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.066 · Cited by 45
Karki, N., Verma, N., Trozzi, F., Tao, P., Kraka, E., & Zoltowski, B. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22041573 · Cited by 43
Guanosine monophosphate reductase 1 is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease
Liu, H., Luo, K., & Luo, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21256-6 · Cited by 42
A new paradigm for applying deep learning to protein–ligand interaction prediction
Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, Y., Guo, J., Wei, Y., Mu, Y., Zheng, L., & Li, W. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae145 · Cited by 41
Wang, X., Yang, X., Lu, C., Zhang, J., Li, B., Du, Z., Wang, J., Wang, J., Juhasz, A., Yang, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136718 · Cited by 41
Identification of binding sites contributing to volatile anesthetic effects on GABA type A receptors
Woll, K. A., Zhou, X., Bhanu, N. V., Garcia, B. A., Covarrubias, M., Miller, K. W., & Eckenhoff, R. G. (2018) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201701347r · Cited by 38
Alves, I., Staneva, G., Tessier, C., Salgado, G. F., & Nuss, P. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.02.021 · Cited by 40
Qiu, Y., Hou, Y., Gohel, D., Zhou, Y., Xu, J., Bykova, M., Yang, Y., Leverenz, J. B., Pieper, A. A., Nussinov, R., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114128 · Cited by 40
Zhou, H., Cao, H., & Skolnick, J. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00309 · Cited by 39
Reactivity of Diphenylpropynone Derivatives Toward Metal-Associated Amyloid-β Species
Pithadia, A. S., Kochi, A., Soper, M. T., Beck, M. W., Liu, Y., Lee, S., DeToma, A. S., Ruotolo, B. T., & Lim, M. H. (2012) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic302084g · Cited by 38
Protein representations: Encoding biological information for machine learning in biocatalysis
Harding-Larsen, D., Funk, J., Madsen, N. G., Gharabli, H., Acevedo-Rocha, C. G., Mazurenko, S., & Welner, D. H. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108459 · Cited by 38
Grancieri, M., Verediano, T. A., Sant'Ana, C. T., de Assis, A., Toledo, R. L., de Mejia, E. G., & Martino, H. S. D. (2022) · PharmaNutrition · doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2022.100298 · Cited by 37
Ranking power of the SQM/COSMO scoring function on carbonic anhydrase II-inhibitor complexes.
Pecina, A., Brynda, J., Vrzal, L., Gnanasekaran, R., Hořejší, M., Eyrilmez, S. M., Řezáč, J., Lepšík, M., Řezáčová, P., Hobza, P., et al. (2018) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201701104 · Cited by 36
Li, W., Zhang, F., Wu, R., Jia, L., Li, G., Guo, Y., Liu, C., & Wang, G. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.00259 · Cited by 34
FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening
Zhou, H., Cao, H., & Skolnick, J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01160 · Cited by 32
Khadke, S. K., Lee, J.-H., Kim, Y.-G., Raj, V., & Lee, J. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9091133 · Cited by 33
Lone, S. A., Khan, S., & Ahmad, A. (2020) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-019-01781-2 · Cited by 32
Decoding the Foodome: Molecular Networks Connecting Diet and Health
Menichetti, G., Barabási, A.-L., & Loscalzo, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-062322-030557 · Cited by 32
Zhang, Y., Guo, L., Huang, J., Sun, Y., He, F., Zloh, M., & Wang, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20081966 · Cited by 30
Liu, Y., Kochi, A., Pithadia, A. S., Lee, S., Nam, Y., Beck, M. W., He, X., Lee, D., & Lim, M. H. (2013) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic400851w · Cited by 30
Antioxidant activity of the main phenolics found in red fruits: An in vitro and in silico study
Gonçalves, A. C., Falcão, A., Alves, G., Silva, L. R., & Flores-Félix, J. D. (2024) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139459 · Cited by 28
Ketamine Metabolite (2 R,6 R)-Hydroxynorketamine Interacts with μ and κ Opioid Receptors
Joseph, T. T., Bu, W., Lin, W., Zoubak, L., Yeliseev, A., Liu, R., Eckenhoff, R. G., & Brannigan, G. (2021) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00741 · Cited by 28
Heusser, S. A., Lycksell, M., Wang, X., McComas, S. E., Howard, R. J., & Lindahl, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1809650115 · Cited by 23
Woll, K. A., Guzik-Lendrum, S., Bensel, B. M., Bhanu, N. V., Dailey, W. P., Garcia, B. A., Gilbert, S. P., & Eckenhoff, R. G. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.002182 · Cited by 23
Involvement of the GABAA receptor α subunit in the mode of action of etifoxine
Mattei, C., Taly, A., Soualah, Z., Saulais, O., Henrion, D., Guérineau, N. C., Verleye, M., & Legros, C. (2019) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.04.034 · Cited by 26
Turcu, A. L., Companys-Alemany, J., Phillips, M. B., Patel, D. S., Griñán-Ferré, C., Loza, M. I., Brea, J. M., Pérez, B., Soto, D., Sureda, F. X., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114354 · Cited by 27
Zhang, C., Zheng, W., Cheng, M., Omenn, G. S., Freddolino, P. L., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00359 · Cited by 27
Retro Drug Design: From Target Properties to Molecular Structures
Wang, Y., Michael, S., Yang, S.-M., Huang, R., Cruz-Gutierrez, K., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Xia, M., Shinn, P., & Sun, H. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00123 · Cited by 24
Díaz-Godínez, C., González-Galindo, X., Meza-Menchaca, T., Bobes, R. J., de la Garza, M., León-Sicairos, N., Laclette, J. P., & Carrero, J. C. (2019) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20180850 · Cited by 23
Chen, G.-W., & Yang, M.-H. (2021) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal11080873 · Cited by 23
Evaluating generalization in protein–ligand cofolding methods
Škrinjar, P., Eberhardt, J., Studer, G., Tauriello, G., Schwede, T., & Durairaj, J. (2026) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-026-01797-5 · Cited by 22
Liao, H.-J., & Tzen, J. T. C. (2022) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo12060549 · Cited by 21
Docking simulations suggest that all-trans retinoic acid could bind to retinoid X receptors
Tsuji, M., Shudo, K., & Kagechika, H. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-015-9869-9 · Cited by 19
Yanamala, N., Kapralov, A. A., Djukic, M., Peterson, J., Mao, G., Klein-Seetharaman, J., Stoyanovsky, D. A., Stursa, J., Neuzil, J., & Kagan, V. E. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.601377 · Cited by 19
Chander, P., Gentleman, S., Poliakov, E., & Redmond, T. M. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.364596 · Cited by 19
Nagaraju, M., McGowan, L. C., & Hamelberg, D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300432w · Cited by 18
Cryo-EM structure of the Rous sarcoma virus octameric cleaved synaptic complex intasome
Pandey, K. K., Bera, S., Shi, K., Rau, M. J., Oleru, A. V., Fitzpatrick, J. A. J., Engelman, A. N., Aihara, H., & Grandgenett, D. P. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01855-2 · Cited by 14
Guo, G., & Dong, J. (2022) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2022.2068755 · Cited by 17
Baev, A. Y., Charishnikova, O. S., Khasanov, F. A., Nebesnaya, K. S., Makhmudov, A. R., Rakhmedova, M. T., Khushbaktova, Z. A., Syrov, V. N., & Levitskaya, Y. V. (2022) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2022.106066 · Cited by 16
Nordquist, E. B., Zhao, M., Kumar, A., & MacKerell, A. D. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01189 · Cited by 15
Bondžić, A. M., Senćanski, M. V., Vujačić Nikezić, A. V., Kirillova, M. V., André, V., Kirillov, A. M., & Bondžić, B. P. (2020) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110990 · Cited by 14
Protein-inhibitor interaction studies using NMR
Ishima, R. (2015) · Applications of NMR Spectroscopy · doi:10.2174/9781608059621115010007 · Cited by 13
Structural insights into pink-eyed dilution protein (Oca2)
Mesdaghi, S., Murphy, D. L., Simpkin, A. J., & Rigden, D. J. (2023) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20230060 · Cited by 13
A Putative Binding Model of Nitazene Derivatives at the μ-Opioid Receptor
Clayton, J., Shi, L., Robertson, M. J., Skiniotis, G., Michaelides, M., Stavitskaya, L., & Shen, J. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110437 · Cited by 12
Specificity and mechanism of TonB-dependent ferric catecholate uptake by Fiu
Yang, T., Zou, Y., Ng, H. L., Kumar, A., Newton, S. M., & Klebba, P. E. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1355253 · Cited by 11
“Using AutoDock Vina (Trott and Olson, 2010; Eberhardt et al., 2021), we identified potential FeEnt* binding sites in E. coli Fiu (PDB 6BPM).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Text
Yuksekgonul, M., Bianchi, F., Boen, J., Liu, S., Huang, Z., Guestrin, C., & Zou, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07496 · Cited by 12
Spiegel, M. (2025) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.202403755 · Cited by 12
Zaghloul, E., Handousa, H., Singab, A. N. B., Elmazar, M. M., Ayoub, I. M., & Swilam, N. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12010206 · Cited by 11
Assessing the binding properties of CASP14 targets and models
Egbert, M., Ghani, U., Ashizawa, R., Kotelnikov, S., Nguyen, T., Desta, I., Hashemi, N., Padhorny, D., Kozakov, D., & Vajda, S. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26209 · Cited by 10
Sun, X., Yu, J., Zhu, C., Mo, X., Sun, Q., Yang, D., Su, C., & Lu, Y. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.84155 · Cited by 9
Munawaroh, H. S. H., Gumilar, G. G., Pratiwi, R. N., Khoiriah, S. F., Ningrum, A., Martha, L., Chew, K. W., & Show, P.-L. (2024) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2024.103468 · Cited by 9
NeuralDock: Rapid and Conformation-Agnostic Docking of Small Molecules
Sha, C. M., Wang, J., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.867241 · Cited by 9
Hennen, S. G., Bomble, Y. J., Urbanowicz, B. R., & Bharadwaj, V. S. (2025) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00338a · Cited by 9
Liu, L., Song, W., Zeng, J., & Peng, Z. (2022) · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · doi:10.1021/acsptsci.2c00149 · Cited by 8
Tracing Potential Covalent Inhibitors of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase through Target-Focused Modelling
Bjij, I., Ramharack, P., Khan, S., Cherqaoui, D., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24173125 · Cited by 6
Kim, J.-M., Noh, J., Park, J.-W., Chung, H., Kim, K.-A., Park, S. B., Lee, J.-S., & Park, J.-Y. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14020257 · Cited by 6
Huang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Rehman, H. M., Horváth, D., Zhou, S., Fu, R., Zhang, L., Szöllősi, A. G., & Li, Z. (2023) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03181-x · Cited by 6
RetractedSantos-Martins, D. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9943-y · Cited by 5
Deciphering DEL pocket patterns through contrastive learning
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Zhan, R., Qian, R., Hu, Q., & Huang, J. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69663-y · Cited by 2
Analysis of NUDIX enzymes across fungi reveals previously unrecognized diversity
Pasterny, Z., Barua, D., Mancera, E., & Muszewska, A. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11778-5 · Cited by 2
“2.5 [32, 33] was performed for the twelve most common NUDIX substrates: 8-oxo-dGDP, 8-oxo-dGTP, ADP-glucose, ADP-ribose, Ap3 A, Ap4 A, Ap6 A, dATP, DHNTP, HSCoA, NAD + and NADPH.”
InfluentialMicrobiome-generated antifolates.
London, R. E. (2026) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.70252 · Cited by 1
HIPPO: HIstogram-based Pseudo-POtential for scoring protein-ssRNA fragment-based docking poses
Kravchenko, A., de Vries, S. J., Smaïl-Tabbone, M., & Chauvot de Beauchene, I. (2024) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05733-6 · Cited by 1
Wu, Q., Yang, F., An, Q., Liu, Y., Tian, H., Du, Y., Cai, W., Lei, M., Xu, J., Deng, L., et al. (2026) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.126.049987
Yang, M., Li, S., Li, R., Dong, Y., Zhou, M., Zhao, J., Liu, M., & Tan, R. (2026) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2026.05.006
Yang, M., Li, R., Dong, Y., Zhou, M., Zhao, J., Liu, M., & Tan, R. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.28.702456
Metadata
- Authors
- Trott, O., & Olson, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olson, Arthur J.
- ORCID
- Olson, Arthur J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 455-461
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- PMC
- PMC3041641
- OpenAlex
- W2134967712
- Cited by
- 38,412
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4951 · 2025: 5289 · 2024: 4793 · 2023: 4241 · 2022: 4250 · 2021: 3687 · 2020: 2903 · 2019: 1858 · 2018: 1560 · 2017: 1225 · 2016: 1035 · 2015: 832 · 2014: 613 · 2013: 508 · 2012: 346
- FWCI
- 212.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM069832)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- AutoDock Vina, molecular docking, virtual screening, scoring functions, binding mode prediction, multithreading, multi-core parallelization, grid map
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Automation, Binding Sites, Hydrogen Bonding, Ligands, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Solvents, Thermodynamics, Time Factors, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review