Cited by 317Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The PTSD Checklist—Civilian Version: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure in a Nonclinical Sample

Open access
Conybeare, Daniel, Behar, Evelyn, Solomon, Ari, Newman, Michelle G., Borkovec, T. D.·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives We examined the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the posttraumatic stress diorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C; Blanchard, Jones-Alexander, Buckley, & Forneris, 1996) among unselected undergraduate students. Participants Participants were 471 undergraduate students at a large university in the Eastern United States and were not preselected based on trauma history or symptom severity. Results The PCL-C demonstrated good internal consistency and retest reliability. Compared with alternative measures of PTSD, the PCL-C showed favorable patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. In contrast to previous research using samples with known trauma exposure, we found support for both 1-factor and 2-factor models of PTSD symptoms. Conclusions Overall, the PCL-C appears to be a valid and reliable measure of PTSD symptoms, even among nonclinical samples, and is superior to some alternative measures of PTSD. The factor structure among nonclinical samples may not reflect each of the PTSD symptom "clusters" (i.e., reexperiencing, avoidance/numbing, and hyperarousal).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21845

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HSCL-25 and HTQ have been used internationally with sexual-violence survivors and have solid psychometric properties with conflict-affected samples.

    “Both the HSCL-25 and the HTQ have been used internationally with sexualviolence survivors 20 and have solid psychometric properties with conflict-affected samples [21][22][23]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conybeare, D., Behar, E., Solomon, A., Newman, M. G., & Borkovec, T. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Williams College (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Conybeare, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-19
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
699-713
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W1544932120
Cited by
317
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31mh068167-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058593, R01 MH58593, R01 MH58593 TO, 1F31 MH068167-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version, post-traumatic stress disorder, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, non-clinical sample, undergraduate students, re-experiencing, avoidance and numbing, hyperarousal, PTSD symptom clusters
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review