CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Brief acceptance-based therapy for women with high-risk pregnancies: Uncontrolled pilot of an intervention for inpatients

Tunnell, Natalie C., Suterwala, Mustafa, Meuret, Alicia E.·2019·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.004

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A range of interventions-acceptance-based therapy, yoga, relaxation, psychosomatic approaches, music therapy, pet therapy, bed exercise, aromatherapy, educational programs, a stress-coping app, and integrative modalities-have been studied for depressive or anxiety symptoms during hospitalization for obstetric complications.

    “Interventions including acceptance-based therapy32, yoga21, relaxation techniques26,49,77,78, psychosomatic interventions45, music therapy38,79, pet therapy27, bed exercise programs31, aromatherapy80, educational interventions81,82, a stress-coping app83 and other integrative modalities84 have been studied.”

    From Prevalence of Depression or Anxiety During Antepartum Hospitalizations for Obstetric Complications (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

  • ACT may be a promising framework for PMADs; however, empirical evidence for potential mechanisms of change that can be applied across therapeutic approaches is lacking.

    “Overall, these studies indicate that ACT may be a promising framework; however, empirical evidence for potential mechanisms of change that can be applied across therapeutic approaches is lacking.”

    From Acceptance-based process variables on postpartum well-being and distress: The mediating role of psychological flexibility (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Tunnell, N. C., Suterwala, M., & Meuret, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tunnell, Natalie C.
  • Meuret, Alicia E.
ORCID
Meuret, Alicia E.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
14
Pages
127-135
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.10.004
OpenAlex
W2983741907
Cited by
9
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jerry M. Lewis, M.D. Mental Health Research Foundation (001664)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance-based therapy, high-risk pregnancy, preterm premature rupture of membranes, prenatal anxiety, antenatal depression, psychological flexibility, post-traumatic stress, positive and negative affect, brief psychological intervention, hospitalized pregnant women, bed rest, treatment feasibility and acceptability, postpartum follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review