Cited by 50Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Specificity of Homework Compliance Effects on Treatment Outcome in CBT: Evidence from a Controlled Trial on Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia: Homework Effects in CBT for Panic Disorder

Cammin-Nowak, Sandra, Helbig-Lang, Sylvia, Lang, Thomas, Gloster, Andrew T., Fehm, Lydia, Gerlach, Alexander L., Ströhle, Andreas, Deckert, Jürgen +5 more·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although homework assignments are an integral component of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and relate to positive therapy outcomes, it is unclear whether specific homework types and their completion have specific effects on outcome. METHOD: Data from N = 292 patients (75% female, mean age 36 years) with panic disorder and agoraphobia and treated with standardized CBT were analyzed with homework compliance quality and quantity for different types of homework serving as predictors for different outcome variables. RESULTS: Quality ratings of homework completion were stronger outcome predictors than quantitative compliance ratings. Exposure homework was a better outcome predictor than homework relating to psychoeducation and self-monitoring. CONCLUSION: Different aspects of homework compliance and specific homework types might differentially relate to CBT outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21975

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cammin-Nowak, S., Helbig-Lang, S., Lang, T., Gloster, A. T., Fehm, L., Gerlach, A. L., Ströhle, A., Deckert, J., Kircher, T., Hamm, A. O., Alpers, G. W., Arolt, V., & Wittchen, H.-U.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Technical University of Dresden - Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-15
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
616-629
ISSN
0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1938481354
Cited by
50
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
homework compliance, cognitive behavioral therapy, panic disorder, agoraphobia, treatment outcomes, psychoeducation, self-monitoring, homework quality, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review