Cited by 112Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A national survey of practicing psychologists’ use and attitudes toward homework in psychotherapy

Kazantzis, Nikolaos, Lampropoulos, Georgios K., Deane, Frank P.·2005·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Homework assignments have been studied extensively in psychotherapy research, but there is little data on the way in which homework is transferred to clinical practice. A survey was conducted of 827 practicing psychologists nationwide regarding their use and attitudes toward homework. Overall, 68% of the present sample indicated that they "often" or "almost always" used homework assignments. Factor analysis revealed that practitioners have a range of attitudes that can be classified as reflecting the notion that homework has (a) a negative impact on in-session therapeutic work and (b) a positive effect on therapy outcomes. More positive attitudes were reported among those with a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation. Nevertheless, the use of homework among psychodynamic/analytic practitioners reported in the present sample was unexpected and suggests that theoretical and empirical work is required to examine homework's effects in a range of psychotherapy approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.73.4.742

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar techniques and exercises might be used in different therapeutic approaches although the specific language and the theoretical embedding might differ.

    “This is consistent with general findings from the literature, showing that similar techniques and exercises might be used in different therapeutic approaches although the specific language and the theoretical embedding might differ (Kazantzis et al., 2005; Cuijpers et al., 2019; Banon et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazantzis, N., Lampropoulos, G. K., & Deane, F. P.
Affiliations
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Ball State University (US)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
742-748
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2109979704
Cited by
112
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
homework, psychotherapy, psychologists' attitudes, clinical practice, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, therapeutic work, treatment outcomes, theoretical orientation
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Practice, Psychological, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reinforcement, Psychology, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review