Cited by 23Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Homework Compliance and Quality in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for Anxiety Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Conklin, Laren R., Curreri, Andrew J., Farchione, Todd J., Barlow, David H.·2021·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Homework assignments are an integral part of cognitive behavioral therapy, providing patients with opportunities to practice skills between sessions. Generally, greater homework compliance is associated with better treatment outcomes. However, fewer studies have examined the effect of homework quality on treatment outcomes. This study examined homework compliance and quality as predictors of outcome and attrition across five CBT protocols. A sample of 179 individuals with principal diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder were randomized to receive a transdiagnostic CBT protocol (the Unified Protocol) or a single-diagnosis CBT protocol corresponding to their principal diagnosis. The Unified Protocol had a lower homework burden than the majority of the single-diagnosis protocols, which varied in degree of assigned homework. Despite this, there were no differences in average homework compliance or quality across principal diagnosis, treatment condition, or their interaction. Homework quality was significantly related to all symptom outcomes (self-reported and clinician-rated anxiety and depressive symptoms, clinician-rated clinical severity). Homework compliance was significantly related to clinician-rated anxiety symptom outcomes. Additionally, greater homework quality and compliance were both significantly associated with increased odds of completing treatment, suggesting homework variables can be useful and easily obtainable predictors of treatment retention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2021.01.001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conklin, L. R., Curreri, A. J., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Conklin, Laren R.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
1008-1018
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121485639
Cited by
23
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH090053)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
homework compliance, homework quality, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Unified Protocol, treatment discontinuation, treatment retention, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms, clinical severity
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review