Cited by 113Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and Disorders

LY2495655, an antimyostatin antibody, in pancreatic cancer: a randomized, phase 2 trial

Open access
Golan, Talia, Geva, Ravit, Richards, Donald, Madhusudan, Srinivasan, Lin, Boris Kin, Wang, Haofei Tiffany, Walgren, Richard A., Stemmer, Salomon M.·2018·Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

Abstract

Background: Cachexia is a formidable clinical challenge in pancreatic cancer. We assessed LY2495655 (antimyostatin antibody) plus standard‐of‐care chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer using cachexia status as a stratifier. Methods: In this randomized, phase 2 trial, patients with stage II–IV pancreatic cancer were randomized to 300 mg LY2495655, 100 mg LY2495655, or placebo, plus physician‐choice chemotherapy from a prespecified list of standard‐of‐care regimens for first and later lines of care. Investigational treatment was continued during second‐line treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: Overall, 125 patients were randomized. In August 2014, 300 mg LY2495655 was terminated due to imbalance in death rates between the treatment arms; in January 2015, 100 mg LY2495655 treatment was terminated due to futility. LY2495655 did not improve overall survival: the hazard ratio was 1.70 (90% confidence interval, 1.1–2.7) for 300 mg vs. placebo and 1.3 (0.82–2.1) for 100 mg vs. placebo (recommended doses). Progression‐free survival results were consistent with the overall survival results. A numerically higher hazard ratio was observed in patients with weight loss (WL) of ≥5% (cachexia) than with <5% WL within 6 months before randomization. Subgroup analyses for patients stratified by WL in the 6 months preceding enrollment suggested that functional responses to LY2495655 (either dose) may have been superior in patients with <5% WL vs. patients with ≥5% WL. Among possibly drug‐related adverse events, fatigue, diarrhoea, and anorexia were more common in LY2495655‐treated than in placebo‐treated patients. Conclusions: In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, LY2495655 did not confer clinical benefit in pancreatic cancer. Our data highlight the importance of assessing survival when investigating therapeutic management of cachexia and support the use of WL as a stratifier (independent of performance status).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcsm.12331

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golan, T., Geva, R., Richards, D., Madhusudan, S., Lin, B. K., Wang, H. T., Walgren, R. A., & Stemmer, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • US Oncology Research Tyler TX USA
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Walgren, Richard A.
Venue
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-27
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
871-879
ISSN
  • 2190-5991 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6009
OpenAlex
W2883614888
Cited by
109
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
myostatin, pancreatic cancer, cachexia, weight loss, chemotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review