The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current approaches to waste polymer utilization and minimization: a review
Abstract
The mass production of polymer products, in particular plastics, and their widespread use depending on the inherent advantages they have, make these materials ironically a threat to life on Earth. Polymer recycling is being considered as one of the most widely accepted remedies to the threat of growing amounts of plastic waste by both the public and scientists. In practice, recycling is associated with many difficulties, such as problems related to separation, sorting and cleaning operations, lack of fiscal subsidies, instability of selective garbage separation programs, high transport and electricity costs, etc. Still, a large section of society and the authorities agree on the necessity and importance of recycling to protect the environment, and natural habitats and resources for future generations in a balanced manner to conserve raw materials, and to reduce energy consumption, municipal solid waste production and greenhouse gas emission. The recycling effort is almost endless in itself and includes a variety of approaches such as refurbishing, mechanically reshaping, chemically treating, thermally utilizing, etc. Some novel approaches such as application in carbon capture or synthesis of carbon nanostructures from the plastic waste are among the new process technologies of recycling. From traditional and promising polymer waste utilization approaches, this review will highlight sustainable methods to reduce impacts of plastic waste on the environment. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastics Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities
Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0311 · Cited by 3,201
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Photodegradation and photostabilization of polymers, especially polystyrene: review
Yousif, E., & Haddad, R. (2013) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-398 · Cited by 1,503
Plant oil renewable resources as green alternatives in polymer science
Meier, M. A. R., Metzger, J. O., & Schubert, U. S. (2007) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b703294c · Cited by 1,487
Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics
Song, J. H., Murphy, R. J., Narayan, R., & Davies, G. B. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0289 · Cited by 971
Phthalates and other additives in plastics: human exposure and associated health outcomes
Meeker, J. D., Sathyanarayana, S., & Swan, S. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0268 · Cited by 835
Biodegradable Polymers-A Review on Recent Trends and Emerging Perspectives
Luckachan, G. E., & Pillai, C. K. S. (2011) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-011-0317-1 · Cited by 767
Material Recycling - Trends and Perspectives
(2012) · doi:10.5772/2003 · Cited by 235
Carbon nanotubes synthetized from gaseous products of waste polymer pyrolysis and their application
Borsodi, N., Szentes, A., Miskolczi, N., Wu, C., & Liu, X. (2016) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2016.05.018 · Cited by 86
Cited by
The world of plastic waste: A review
Nayanathara Thathsarani Pilapitiya, P. G. C., & Ratnayake, A. S. (2024) · Cleaner Materials · doi:10.1016/j.clema.2024.100220 · Cited by 1,034
Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management
Kibria, M. G., Masuk, N. I., Safayet, R., Nguyen, H. Q., & Mourshed, M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research · doi:10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z · Cited by 884
Nižetić, S., Djilali, N., Papadopoulos, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397 · Cited by 538
Current technologies for plastic waste treatment: A review
Zhang, F., Zhao, Y., Wang, D., Yan, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, P., Ding, T., Chen, L., & Chen, C. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124523 · Cited by 532
Why is recycling of postconsumer plastics so challenging?
Vogt, B. D., Stokes, K. K., & Kumar, S. K. (2021) · ACS Applied Polymer Materials · doi:10.1021/acsapm.1c00648 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Okan, M., Aydin, H. M., & Barsbay, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-27
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-21
- ISSN
- 0142-0356 (ISSN-L)
- 0268-2575
- 1097-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2884989805
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 16.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.