Cited by 57Digital Imaging for Blood DiseasesCell Image Analysis TechniquesImage Processing Techniques and Applications

Microscopic malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading on benchmark datasets

Rehman, Amjad, Abbas, Naveed, Saba, Tanzila, Mehmood, Zahid, Mahmood, Toqeer, Ahmed, Khawaja Tehseen·2018·Microscopy Research and Technique

Abstract

Malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading is hard and still far from perfection. Inaccurate diagnosis and grading has caused tremendous deaths rate particularly in young children worldwide. The current research deeply reviews automated malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading in thin blood smear digital images through image analysis and computer vision based techniques. Actually, state-of-the-art reveals that current proposed practices present partially or morphology dependent solutions to the problem of computer vision based microscopy diagnosis of malaria parasitemia. Accordingly, a deep appraisal of the current practices is investigated, compared and analyzed on benchmark datasets. The open gaps are highlighted and the future directions are laid down for a complete automated microscopy diagnosis for malaria parasitemia based on those factors that have not been affected by other diseases. Moreover, a general computer vision framework to perform malaria parasitemia estimation/grading is constructed in universal directions. Finally, remaining problems are highlighted and possible directions are suggested. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: The current research presents a microscopic malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading of malaria in thin blood smear digital images through image analysis and computer vision based techniques. The open gaps are highlighted and future directions for a complete automated microscopy diagnosis of malaria parasitemia mentioned.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jemt.23071

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehman, A., Abbas, N., Saba, T., Mehmood, Z., Mahmood, T., & Ahmed, K. T.
Affiliations
  • Al Yamamah University (SA)
  • Islamia College University (PK)
  • Prince Sultan University (SA)
  • University of Engineering and Technology Taxila (PK)
  • Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
Corresponding author
Rehman, Amjad
Venue
Microscopy Research and Technique
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09
Volume
81
Issue
9
Pages
1042-1058
ISSN
  • 1059-910X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0029
OpenAlex
W2892057769
Cited by
57
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microscopy Research and Technique (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Prince Sultan University (RG-CCIS-2017-06-02)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Image Processing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
malaria parasitaemia, thin blood smear images, computer vision, image analysis, benchmark dataset, malaria diagnosis
MeSH terms
Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Malaria, Microscopy, Severity of Illness Index, Parasitemia, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review