Diagnostic Accuracy of a Thick Blood Smear Compared to qPCR for Malaria Associated with Pregnancy in Colombia
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the thick blood smear (TBS) versus quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the diagnosis of malaria associated with pregnancy (MAP) caused by P. falciparum or P. vivax in Colombia in its gestational malaria (GM), placental malaria (PM), and congenital malaria (CM) forms as well as to compare its accuracy in different subgroups of pregnant women according to the presence of fever, anemia and a history of malaria. This was a diagnostic evaluation of 829 pregnant women, 579 placentas, 381 umbilical cord samples, and 221 neonatal peripheral blood samples. Accuracy was evaluated based on the parameters of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and validity index, with their 95% confidence intervals. The frequency of GM was 36% (n = 297/829), PM 27% (n = 159/579), and CM 16.5% (n = 63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (n = 5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood samples. For GM, the sensitivity was 55%, with higher rates in those infected with P. vivax (68%), with a history of malaria (69%), and with fever (96%). These three subgroups presented the best results in terms of the negative likelihood ratio and validity index. For PM, sensitivity was 8%; in subgroup analyses in terms of species, symptomatology (anemia and fever), and history of malaria, it was 1–18%, and the negative likelihood ratio was >0.80 in all subgroups. No false positives were recorded in any of the subgroups. The TBS did not detect any cases of CM. This study found the TBS yielded satisfactory results in terms of diagnosing GM for P. vivax, pregnant women with previous malaria and febrile. It also showed that the TBS is not useful for diagnosing PM and CM. It is necessary to conduct surveillance of MAP with molecular methods in in groups where TBS is deficient (asymptomatic GM, P. falciparum, and pregnant women without history of malaria) to optimize the timely treatment of PM and CM, avoid the deleterious effects of MAP and achieve the malaria elimination goals in Colombia.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This diagnostic evaluation compared thick blood smear (TBS) against qPCR for malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia and found TBS useful mainly for gestational malaria in P. vivax, febrile, or previously malaria-exposed pregnant women. TBS performed poorly for placental malaria and detected no congenital malaria cases.
Key findings
- Gestational malaria: qPCR positivity was 35.8% (297/829); TBS sensitivity was 55%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 79.9%. Sensitivity was highest in febrile women (96%), those with malaria history (69%), and P. vivax infections (68%), but lowest in P. falciparum (30%), no fever (29%), and no malaria in the previous year (13%).
- Placental malaria: qPCR positivity was 27.4% (159/579); TBS sensitivity was 8.2%, ranged from 1.2% to 17.6% in subgroups, with negative likelihood ratio >0.80 and Youden index <0.20 in all subgroups; no false positives were recorded.
- Congenital malaria: qPCR detected 16.5% (63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood; TBS detected no cases, so accuracy parameters could not be estimated.
- Submicroscopic cases accounted for 45% of gestational malaria, 92% of placental malaria, and 100% of congenital malaria in this study.
Methods
- Diagnostic evaluation in Colombia’s main malaria-endemic area using samples collected 2010–2019: 829 pregnant women, 579 placentas, 381 umbilical cord blood samples, and 221 neonatal peripheral blood samples; sampling was non-probabilistic from antenatal care services.
- TBS was the index test and qPCR the reference standard; tests used the same blood samples, were processed independently and blindly, and accuracy was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, and validity index with 95% CIs.
- Analyses were done overall and by subgroups including P. falciparum or P. vivax, fever, anemia, malaria in the last year, and gestational malaria history; analyses used EPIDAT.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: low numbers of mixed malaria cases prevented diagnostic accuracy analyses for mixed infections; comprehensive analyses by parasitemia level were not conducted; qPCR cannot determine microorganism viability or transmission potential.
- Evident from the text: most samples were not from the same mother–placenta–neonate subjects, so gestational, placental, and congenital malaria results were analyzed independently; sampling was non-probabilistic; congenital malaria accuracy was not estimable because TBS detected no cases; the febrile placental malaria subgroup had only 33 cases and could not yield accuracy estimates.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Among qPCR-positive placental malaria cases, P. falciparum accounted for 45.3% (72/159).
“The species identified with qPCR were P. falciparum, 45.3% (n = 72); P. vivax, 40.9% (n = 65); and mixed, 13.8% (n = 22)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a positive predictive value of 100%.
“For GM, the TBS had a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 79.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
Among 579 placental blood samples, qPCR revealed that 27.4% (159/579) were positive for placental malaria.
“The frequency of GM was 36% (n = 297/829), PM 27% (n = 159/579), and CM 16.5% (n = 63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (n = 5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood samples.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
“Both tests were performed on 579 placental blood samples, and the results were as follows: qPCR revealed that 27.4% (n = 159) were positive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-probabilistic sampling and the fact that most samples were not from the same subjects do not bias the independent estimates of gestational, placental, and congenital malaria.
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
- Findingown data
Among qPCR-positive umbilical cord blood samples, P. falciparum accounted for 63.5% (40/63).
“According to the umbilical cord blood samples, 16.5% (n = 63) were positive, P. falciparum 63.5% (n = 40), P. vivax 30.2% (n = 19), and mixed malaria 6.3% (n = 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
Among qPCR-positive placental malaria cases, mixed malaria accounted for 13.8% (22/159).
“The species identified with qPCR were P. falciparum, 45.3% (n = 72); P. vivax, 40.9% (n = 65); and mixed, 13.8% (n = 22)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
Among 221 neonatal peripheral blood samples, qPCR detected congenital malaria in 2% (5/221).
“The frequency of GM was 36% (n = 297/829), PM 27% (n = 159/579), and CM 16.5% (n = 63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (n = 5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood samples.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
“According to the neonatal peripheral blood samples, there were no mixed malaria, and there was a low frequency of P. vivax (n = 3) and P. falciparum (n = 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-probabilistic sampling and the fact that most samples were not from the same subjects do not bias the independent estimates of gestational, placental, and congenital malaria.
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
- Findingown data
Among qPCR-positive placental malaria cases, P. vivax accounted for 40.9% (65/159).
“The species identified with qPCR were P. falciparum, 45.3% (n = 72); P. vivax, 40.9% (n = 65); and mixed, 13.8% (n = 22)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a negative predictive value of 79.9%.
“For GM, the TBS had a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 79.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
Among 829 pregnant women who underwent qPCR, 35.8% (297/829) tested positive for gestational malaria.
“The frequency of GM was 36% (n = 297/829), PM 27% (n = 159/579), and CM 16.5% (n = 63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (n = 5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood samples.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
“There were 829 pregnant women who underwent qPCR, and 35.8% (n = 297) tested positive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-probabilistic sampling and the fact that most samples were not from the same subjects do not bias the independent estimates of gestational, placental, and congenital malaria.
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a specificity of 100%.
“For GM, the TBS had a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 79.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a sensitivity of 55%.
“For GM, the TBS had a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 79.9%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
Among 381 umbilical cord blood samples, qPCR detected congenital malaria in 16.5% (63/381).
“The frequency of GM was 36% (n = 297/829), PM 27% (n = 159/579), and CM 16.5% (n = 63/381) in umbilical cord samples and 2% (n = 5/221) in neonatal peripheral blood samples.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
“According to the umbilical cord blood samples, 16.5% (n = 63) were positive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-probabilistic sampling and the fact that most samples were not from the same subjects do not bias the independent estimates of gestational, placental, and congenital malaria.
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
- Findingown data
Among qPCR-positive umbilical cord blood samples, P. vivax accounted for 30.2% (19/63).
“According to the umbilical cord blood samples, 16.5% (n = 63) were positive, P. falciparum 63.5% (n = 40), P. vivax 30.2% (n = 19), and mixed malaria 6.3% (n = 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For placental malaria, the thick blood smear negative predictive value ranged from 49.3% to 93.9%.
“The negative predictive value ranged from 49.3% to 93.9%, while the proportion of patients correctly diagnosed ranged from 52.0% to 94.0%, with the latter being explained by the absence of FPs in the TBS (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 69% in pregnant women with a history of malaria.
“the best sensitivity results were found in those infected with P. vivax (68%), with a history of malaria (69%), and with febrile symptoms (96%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For placental malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity ranged from 1.2% to 17.6% in subgroup analyses by causal species, symptomatology, and history of malaria.
“For PM, the sensitivity of the TBS was 8.2%; in subgroup analyses by causal species, symptomatology, and history of malaria, it ranged from 1.2% to 17.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
In the subgroup of 152 pregnant women with parasitemia reported, parasitemia was not related to the diagnostic accuracy of the thick blood smear.
“Both tests revealed that all of these samples were positive (i.e., in this subgroup of 152 pregnant women, parasitemia was not related to the diagnostic accuracy of the TBS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For placental malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 8.2%.
“For PM, the sensitivity of the TBS was 8.2%; in subgroup analyses by causal species, symptomatology, and history of malaria, it ranged from 1.2% to 17.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For placental malaria, the thick blood smear negative likelihood ratio was greater than 0.80 in all subgroups.
“The negative likelihood ratio was greater than 0.80 and the Youden index value was less than 0.20 in all subgroups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
No false positives were recorded in any of the subgroups.
“No false positives were recorded in any of the subgroups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 30% in pregnant women infected with P. falciparum.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 96% in febrile pregnant women.
“the best sensitivity results were found in those infected with P. vivax (68%), with a history of malaria (69%), and with febrile symptoms (96%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 29% in pregnant women without fever.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a validity index of 83.8%.
“In the population evaluated for GM, the TBS had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45, a Youden index value of 0.55, and a validity index (correctly diagnosed patients) of 83.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 33% in pregnant women with mild anemia.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For placental malaria, the thick blood smear Youden index value was less than 0.20 in all subgroups.
“The negative likelihood ratio was greater than 0.80 and the Youden index value was less than 0.20 in all subgroups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45.
“In the population evaluated for GM, the TBS had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45, a Youden index value of 0.55, and a validity index (correctly diagnosed patients) of 83.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 68% in pregnant women infected with P. vivax.
“the best sensitivity results were found in those infected with P. vivax (68%), with a history of malaria (69%), and with febrile symptoms (96%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
In 17 negative thick blood smears, mixed placental malaria was diagnosed by qPCR.
“In 17 negative TBSs, mixed PM was diagnosed by qPCR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear had a Youden index value of 0.55.
“In the population evaluated for GM, the TBS had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45, a Youden index value of 0.55, and a validity index (correctly diagnosed patients) of 83.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingreasoning
For placental malaria, the proportion of patients correctly diagnosed ranged from 52.0% to 94.0%.
“The negative predictive value ranged from 49.3% to 93.9%, while the proportion of patients correctly diagnosed ranged from 52.0% to 94.0%, with the latter being explained by the absence of FPs in the TBS (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Findingown data
The thick blood smear did not detect any cases of congenital malaria.
“The TBS did not detect any cases of CM.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
“Only the qPCR data are presented because none of the children tested positive in the TBS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Also stated in: § 3. Results · plain
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 20% in pregnant women without a history of malaria in the current pregnancy.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 38.5% in pregnant women without anemia.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingown data
For gestational malaria, the thick blood smear sensitivity was 13% in pregnant women without a history of malaria in the previous year.
“The lowest sensitivity values were found in those infected with P. falciparum (30%); pregnant women without fever (29%), without anemia (38.5%), or mild anemia (33%); and those without a history of malaria in the previous year (13%) or in the current pregnancy (20%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
- Findingreasoning
In congenital malaria (CM), the proportion of P. falciparum was higher (62% vs. 32% for P. vivax).
“in CM, the proportion of P. falciparum was higher (62% vs. 32% for P. vivax)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In placental malaria (PM), both species had a similar proportion (45.3% for P. falciparum and 40.9% for P. vivax).
“in PM, both species had a similar proportion (45.3% for P. falciparum and 40.9% for P. vivax)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The negative likelihood ratio for PM was greater than 0.8 in all subgroups.
“The negative likelihood ratio (1 − S/E) was greater than 0.8 in all subgroups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingnone given
In the other subgroups analyzed (P. falciparum cases and asymptomatic pregnant women or those with no history of malaria), TBS performed poorly.
“In the other subgroups analyzed (P. falciparum cases and asymptomatic pregnant women or those with no history of malaria), TBS performed poorly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingcitation
For GM, TBS presented satisfactory diagnostic accuracy parameters in febrile symptomatic women (S = 96%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 92%; NLR = 0.04; and PPCD = 97%).
“in febrile symptomatic women (S = 96%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 92%; NLR = 0.04; and PPCD = 97%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingown data
The TBS did not detect any cases of CM.
“The TBS did not detect any cases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingown data
For GM, TBS presented satisfactory diagnostic accuracy parameters for P. vivax infections (S = 68%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 90%; NLR = 0.3; and PPCD = 92%).
“For GM, TBS presented satisfactory diagnostic accuracy parameters for P. vivax infections (S = 68%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 90%; NLR = 0.3; and PPCD = 92%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingown data
The lowest negative predictive values were found in pregnant women with anemia and a history of malaria.
“The lowest negative predictive values were found in pregnant women with anemia and a history of malaria”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Findingown data
In this study, six (86%) of seven cases of diagnostic mismatch by causal species were related to mixed malaria.
“In this study, six (86%) of seven cases of diagnostic mismatch by causal species were related to mixed malaria”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no false positive in PM with TBS.
“there was no false positive in PM with TBS”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Premisecitation
Some studies on asymptomatic pregnant women found low sensitivity of the thick blood smear (32.3%, 95% CI 20.9-45.3).
“Some studies on asymptomatic pregnant women found low and poor sensitivity (32.3% 95% CI, 20.9–45.3) [27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Ahmed, 2015, Performance of four HRP-2/pLDH combination rapid diagnostic tests and field microscopy as screening tests for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study, Malar. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Colombia, there are few clinical-epidemiological studies on malaria associated with pregnancy.
“In Colombia, there are few clinical–epidemiological studies on MAP [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] 2021, Overview of epidemiology of malaria associated with pregnancy in northwestern Colombia, 1985–2020, J. Commun. Dis.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The high proportion of submicroscopic malaria demonstrates the limitations of the TBS for MAP.
“demonstrating the limitations of the TBS for MAP [13]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Cardona, J., and Carmona, J. (2021). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia 2000-2020. PLoS ONE, 16. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The similar proportion of P. vivax and P. falciparum in PM would contradict several assumptions about P. vivax's lower capacity for clinical damage.
“the similar proportion of P. vivax and P. falciparum in PM would contradict several assumptions about P. vivax’s lower capacity for clinical damage [20,21,22,48]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [20] Gavina, 2018, Clinical outcomes of submicroscopic infections and correlates of protection of VAR2CSA antibodies in a longitudinal study of pregnant women in Colombia, Infect. Immun. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Carmona, 2020, Malaria placentaria submicroscópica: Histopatología y expresión de mediadores de procesos fisiológicos, Rev. Peru. Med. Exp. Salud Pública source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Agudelo, 2017, Submicroscopic and asymptomatic congenital infection by Plasmodium vivax or P. falciparum in Colombia: 37 cases with placental histopathology and cytokine profile in maternal and placental blood, J. Trop. Med.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Dayananda, 2018, Epidemiology, drug resistance, and pathophysiology of Plasmodium vivax malaria, J. Vector Borne Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A community trial in Burkina Faso with 12 months of follow-up demonstrated that active detection strategy has no effect on the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. or the incidence of malaria.
“a community trial in Burkina Faso with 12 months of follow-up demonstrated that active detection strategy has no effect on the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. or the incidence of malaria [33,37] owing to the low sensitivity of the diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Zheng, 2017, Advances in molecular diagnosis of malaria, Adv. Clin. Chem. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Tiono, 2013, A controlled, parallel, cluster-randomized trial of community-wide screening and treatment of asymptomatic carriers of Plasmodium falciparum in Burkina Faso, Malar. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
P. vivax predominated in GM as a reflection of the study region's parasitological and epidemiological situations.
“P. vivax predominated in GM as a reflection of the study region’s parasitological and epidemiological situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The predominance of P. vivax in GM is novel in this field of research, where evaluations of diagnostic accuracy predominate in areas with a higher frequency of P. falciparum.
“which is novel in this field of research, where evaluations of diagnostic accuracy predominate in areas with a higher frequency of P. falciparum [28,29,30]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] Umbers, 2015, Accuracy of an HRP-2/panLDH rapid diagnostic test to detect peripheral and placental Plasmodium falciparum infection in Papua New Guinean women with anaemia or suspected malaria, Malar. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Kashif, 2013, Reliability of rapid diagnostic test for diagnosing peripheral and placental malaria in an area of unstable malaria transmission in Eastern Sudan, Diagn. Pathol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Rogerson, 2003, Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at delivery: Comparison of blood film preparation methods and of blood films with histology, J. Clin. Microbiol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Active case detection strategy has proven ineffective in cases of low endemicity and asymptomatic infections.
“This strategy has proven ineffective in cases of low endemicity and asymptomatic infections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [33] Zheng, 2017, Advances in molecular diagnosis of malaria, Adv. Clin. Chem. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Cao, J., Sturrock, H.J., Cotter, C., Zhou, S., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Tang, L., Gosling, R.D., Feachem, R.G., and Gao, Q. (2014). Communicating and monitoring surveillance and response activities for malaria elimination: China’s “1-3-7” strategy. PLoS Med., 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Sturrock, H.J., Hsiang, M.S., Cohen, J.M., Smith, D.L., Greenhouse, B., Bousema, T., and Gosling, R.D. (2013). Targeting asymptomatic malaria infections: Active surveillance in control and elimination. PLoS Med., 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The TBS is not useful in any case or subgroup for PM.
“this indicates that this test is not useful in any case or subgroup for PM [50]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eusebi, 2013, Diagnostic accuracy measures, Cerebrovasc. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Premisecitation
This is consistent with the findings of other authors who have concluded that microscopy, placental histology, and other methods fail to identify the majority of P. falciparum infections detected by qPCR in peripheral blood and placenta.
“This is consistent with the findings of other authors who have concluded that microscopy, placental histology, and other methods fail to identify the majority of P. falciparum infections detected by qPCR in peripheral blood and placenta.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Mayor, 2012, How hidden can malaria be in pregnant women? Diagnosis by microscopy, placental histology, polymerase chain reaction and detection of histidine-rich protein 2 in plasma, Clin Infect. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Molecular diagnosis is needed for CM.
“demonstrating the need for molecular diagnosis for this clinical form”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Premisecitation
Histopathology is the gold standard for PM diagnosis because it can detect both parasites and hemozoin.
“Histopathology is the gold standard for PM diagnosis because it can detect both parasites and hemozoin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Campos, 2011, Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: Comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
There are difficulties in the diagnosis of mixed malaria using the TBS for GM, even in the case of diagnoses made by expert microscopists.
“there are some difficulties in the diagnosis of mixed malaria using the TBS for GM, even in the case of diagnoses made by expert microscopists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Disease prevalence can influence the overall validity index or correctly classified subjects because accuracy increases as disease prevalence decreases.
“disease prevalence can influence the overall validity index or correctly classified subjects because accuracy increases as disease prevalence decreases [50]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eusebi, 2013, Diagnostic accuracy measures, Cerebrovasc. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Undetected infections are associated with increased clinical risks.
“Undetected infections are associated with increased clinical risks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Mayor, 2012, How hidden can malaria be in pregnant women? Diagnosis by microscopy, placental histology, polymerase chain reaction and detection of histidine-rich protein 2 in plasma, Clin Infect. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A negative TBS result in pregnant women with anemia and a history of malaria is not very reliable for the clinician or treatment staff.
“indicating that a negative TBS result in this type of pregnant woman is not very reliable for the clinician or treatment staff”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Interpretationown data
This study provides new evidence of the good diagnostic performance of the TBS for GM caused by P. vivax and in pregnant women with a history of malaria.
“This study provides new evidence of the good diagnostic performance of the TBS for GM caused by P. vivax and in pregnant women with a history of malaria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous research has shown that there are no differences in parasite density or diagnostic yield between venipuncture and capillary blood.
“previous research has shown that there are no differences in parasite density or diagnostic yield between this type of sample and capillary blood [56]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Solari, 2002, Comparación de las densidades parasitarias en gota gruesa de sangre venosa versus digitopunción en el diagnóstico de Malaria Vivax, Rev. Méd. Herediana source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Given the low number of cases, one of the study's limitations is the lack of diagnostic accuracy analyses for mixed malaria.
“Given the low number of cases, one of the study’s limitations is the lack of diagnostic accuracy analyses for mixed malaria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The TBS performed poorly to detect PM and CM because of its low case-detection capacity.
“It also demonstrated that the TBS performed poorly to detect PM and CM because of its low case-detection capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Interpretationown data
The TBS performed well in this study for the diagnosis of GM in pregnant women with P. vivax infection, previous malaria and fever (or symptoms).
“The TBS performed well in this study for the diagnosis of GM in pregnant women with P. vivax infection, previous malaria and fever (or symptoms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
- May combine two claims. 32
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong qPCR-positive umbilical cord blood samples, mixed malaria accounted for 6.3% (4/63).
“According to the umbilical cord blood samples, 16.5% (n = 63) were positive, P. falciparum 63.5% (n = 40), P. vivax 30.2% (n = 19), and mixed malaria 6.3% (n = 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong qPCR-positive gestational malaria cases, mixed malaria accounted for 3.0% (8/297).
“P. vivax, 63% (n = 187); P. falciparum, 34% (n = 102); and both species (mixed malaria), 3.0% (n = 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong qPCR-positive gestational malaria cases, P. falciparum accounted for 34% (102/297).
“P. vivax, 63% (n = 187); P. falciparum, 34% (n = 102); and both species (mixed malaria), 3.0% (n = 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong qPCR-positive gestational malaria cases, P. vivax accounted for 63% (187/297).
“P. vivax, 63% (n = 187); P. falciparum, 34% (n = 102); and both species (mixed malaria), 3.0% (n = 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor placental malaria, the thick blood smear specificity and positive predictive value were both 100% (no false positives).
“Specificity and positive predictive values were both 100% (no FPs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe frequency of GM was 36%, PM 27%, and CM 2% in neonatal peripheral blood samples and 16.5% in umbilical cord samples.
“The frequency of GM was 36%, PM 27%, and CM 2% in neonatal peripheral blood samples and 16.5% in umbilical cord samples”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the study population, 19.1% of patients had febrile symptoms and 31.3% had anemia.
“In the study population, 19.1% of patients had febrile symptoms and 31.3% had anemia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataP. vivax caused 63% of cases of gestational malaria (GM), P. falciparum 34%, and mixed malaria 3%.
“causing 63% of cases of GM (compared to 34% of P. falciparum and 3% of mixed malaria)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn this study, submicroscopic malaria accounted for 45% of all cases of GM, 92% of PM, and 100% of CM.
“(in this study, 45% of all cases of GM, 92% of PM, and 100% of CM)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor PM, the sensitivity was 8%; in subgroup analyses according to species, symptoms, and history of malaria, it was 1-18%.
“For PM, the sensitivity was 8%; in subgroup analyses according to species, symptoms, and history of malaria, it was 1–18%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor GM, TBS presented satisfactory diagnostic accuracy parameters in pregnant women with a history of malaria (S = 69%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 100%, NPV = 76%; NLR = 0.3; and PPCD = 84).
“in pregnant women with a history of malaria (S = 69%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 100%, NPV = 76%; NLR = 0.3; and PPCD = 84)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn GM, classification errors occurred in 0.8% mainly in cases of mixed GM.
“in GM, classification errors occurred in 0.8% mainly in cases of mixed GM”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to a recent review, thick blood smear sensitivity is low and dependent on variables such as the microscopist's experience, the quality of the slides, and the reagents.
“According to a recent review, although TBS has been the standard for diagnosis globally, its sensitivity is low and is dependent on variables such as the microscopist’s experience, the quality of the slides, and the reagents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Oyegoke, 2022, Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view, Parasitol. Res. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite the thick blood smear's low sensitivity for malaria associated with pregnancy, it remains the gold standard in Colombia because of the factual impossibility of implementing molecular diagnosis in rural areas.
“Despite the TBS’s low sensitivity for MAP, it remains as the gold standard in Colombia because of the factual impossibility of implementing molecular diagnosis in rural areas (where there are highest number of cases of malaria and MAP in Colombia) [31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Campos, 2011, Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: Comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe thick blood smear is not useful for the pre-elimination, elimination, and prevention of reintroduction phases.
“but not for the following three phases: pre-elimination (rates below 5%, high coverage of a good quality control program in the clinical laboratories and medical services, and enhanced case reporting and surveillance), elimination (absence of cases), and prevention of reintroduction [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Oyegoke, 2022, Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view, Parasitol. Res. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther studies found moderate sensitivity of the thick blood smear (63.7%, 95% CI 56.1-70.9).
“in others was moderate (63.7% 95% CI, 56.1–70.9) [28]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Umbers, 2015, Accuracy of an HRP-2/panLDH rapid diagnostic test to detect peripheral and placental Plasmodium falciparum infection in Papua New Guinean women with anaemia or suspected malaria, Malar. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe thick blood smear is useful for the programmatic phase of malaria control.
“Therefore, TBS is useful for the programmatic phase of malaria control”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Oyegoke, 2022, Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view, Parasitol. Res. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe thick blood smear is deficient in asymptomatic gestational malaria, P. falciparum infections, and pregnant women without a history of malaria.
“It is necessary to conduct surveillance of MAP with molecular methods in in groups where TBS is deficient (asymptomatic GM, P. falciparum, and pregnant women without history of malaria)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis reported a prevalence of 16.7% for gestational malaria, 11.0% for placental malaria, and 16.2% for congenital malaria.
“A meta-analysis reported a prevalence of 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0–28.8) for GM, 11.0% (95% CI, 4.1–26.3) PM, and 16.2% (95% CI, 8.2–29.5) CM [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Cardona, J., and Carmona, J. (2021). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia 2000-2020. PLoS ONE, 16. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationWHO guidelines only recommend parasitological diagnosis for symptomatic individuals using light microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests.
“Therefore, WHO guidelines only recommend parasitological diagnosis for symptomatic individuals using light microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests in order to optimize the economic use of diagnostic resources [1,11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] World Health Organization (2022, December 01). World Malaria Report 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240040496.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] World Health Organization (2015). Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Colombian National Institute of Health recommends that pregnant women in endemic areas undergo thick blood smear testing during antenatal check-ups every trimester, even if asymptomatic.
“the Colombian National Institute of Health (NIH) recommends that pregnant women in endemic areas undergo TBS testing during their antenatal check-ups every trimester, even if they are asymptomatic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Instituto Nacional de Salud de Colombia (2022, December 01). Manual Para el Diagnóstico de Malaria no Complicada en Puestos de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento, Available online: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/IA/INS/manual-diagnostico-malaria-no-complicada.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a high frequency of asymptomatic and submicroscopic cases in gestational malaria, placental malaria, and congenital malaria.
“there is a high frequency of asymptomatic and submicroscopic cases (negative by the TBS and positive by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) in GM, PM, and CM [13]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Cardona, J., and Carmona, J. (2021). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia 2000-2020. PLoS ONE, 16. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are reports of high sensitivity of the thick blood smear in febrile pregnant women (94.4%, 95% CI 72.7-99.9).
“and there are reports of sensitivity high in febrile pregnant women (94.4%, 95% CI, 72.7–99.9) [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Kashif, 2013, Reliability of rapid diagnostic test for diagnosing peripheral and placental malaria in an area of unstable malaria transmission in Eastern Sudan, Diagn. Pathol. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe thick blood smear yielded satisfactory results for diagnosing gestational malaria in P. vivax infections, pregnant women with previous malaria, and febrile pregnant women.
“This study found the TBS yielded satisfactory results in terms of diagnosing GM for P. vivax, pregnant women with previous malaria and febrile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn other contexts, satisfactory accuracy parameters have been reported for P. falciparum placental malaria even in low and moderate parasitemia, with sensitivity ranging between 76% and 78%.
“In other contexts, satisfactory accuracy parameters have been reported for P. falciparum PM even in low (less than 1000 parasites/µL) and moderate (1000–10,000 parasites/µL) parasitemia, with sensitivity ranging between 76% and 78% [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Rogerson, 2003, Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at delivery: Comparison of blood film preparation methods and of blood films with histology, J. Clin. Microbiol. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe thick blood smear is not useful for diagnosing placental malaria and congenital malaria.
“It also showed that the TBS is not useful for diagnosing PM and CM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe higher proportion of CM cases by P. falciparum would reflect greater virulence, pathogenicity, and the ability to cross the placenta of this species.
“the higher proportion of CM cases by P. falciparum would reflect greater virulence, pathogenicity, and the ability to cross the placenta of this species [49]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Moxon, 2020, New insights into malaria pathogenesis, Annu. Rev. Pathol. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe study population's anemia frequency (31.3%) is consistent with the Health Situation Analysis of Colombia 2019, which reported a frequency of anemia of 28%.
“These findings are consistent with the Health Situation Analysis of Colombia 2019, which reported a frequency of anemia of 28%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Ministerio de Salud de Colombia (2022, December 01). Análisis de Situación de Salud (ASIS) Colombia, 2019, Available online: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/ED/PSP/asis-2019-colombia.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenqPCR was used as the reference test in all cases.
“qPCR was used as the reference test in all cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe frequencies of GM (36%), PM (27%), and CM (2%) in neonatal peripheral blood and 16.5% in umbilical cord samples are higher (except for CM) than those reported in a meta-analysis in the Colombian literature (17%, 11%, and 16%, respectively).
“which are higher (except for CM) than those reported in a meta-analysis in the Colombian literature, with frequencies of 17%, 11%, and 16%, respectively [13]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Cardona, J., and Carmona, J. (2021). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia 2000-2020. PLoS ONE, 16. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSubmicroscopic cases are not detected or treated, resulting in severe outcomes for the mother and child (anemia and severe malaria) while also perpetuating parasite transmission and disease endemicity.
“submicroscopic cases are not detected or treated, resulting in severe outcomes for the mother and child (anemia and severe malaria) while also perpetuating parasite transmission and disease endemicity [20,23,24,25,26]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [20] Gavina, 2018, Clinical outcomes of submicroscopic infections and correlates of protection of VAR2CSA antibodies in a longitudinal study of pregnant women in Colombia, Infect. Immun. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Buchwald, 2019, Clinical implications of asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in Malawi, Clin. Infect. Dis.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Nguyen, 2018, The persistence and oscillations of submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections over time in Vietnam: An open cohort study, Lancet Infect. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Chen, I., Clarke, S.E., Gosling, R., Hamainza, B., Killeen, G., Magill, A., O’Meara, W., Price, R.N., and Riley, E.M. (2016). “Asymptomatic” Malaria: A chronic and debilitating infection that should be treated. PLoS Med., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Lin, 2014, The role of submicroscopic parasitemia in malaria transmission: What is the evidence?, Trends Parasitol. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe thick blood smear and qPCR were applied to the same blood samples taken at the same time.
“the TBS and qPCR were applied to the same blood samples (samples taken at the same time)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOther authors have estimated that the thick blood smear only detects and controls 20-50% of cases.
“Other authors have estimated that TBS only detects and controls 20–50% of cases [33,36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study evaluated a group of patients representative of those receiving the diagnostic test in routine clinical practice.
“a group of patients representative of those receiving the diagnostic test in routine clinical practice was evaluated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe diagnostic tests were processed independently and blindly, without knowing the results of the other test.
“the diagnostic tests were processed independently and blindly (without knowing the results of the other test)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPM is a difficult clinical form to diagnose, with several studies demonstrating high variability in the sensitivity and specificity of qPCR and rapid diagnostic tests.
“PM is a difficult clinical form to diagnose (in fact, this diagnosis is restricted to the research field), with several studies demonstrating high variability in the sensitivity and specificity of qPCR and rapid diagnostic tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Campos, 2011, Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: Comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn febrile symptomatic women, this research makes no new contributions; rather, it confirms the excellent diagnostic capacity of the TBS in cases of advanced infection or parasitemia levels that cause obvious signs and symptoms.
“In this last case, this research makes no new contributions; rather, it confirms the excellent diagnostic capacity of the TBS in cases of advanced infection or parasitemia levels that cause obvious signs and symptoms, as indicated by WHO guidelines, the Colombian CPG, and some studies on MAP [1,11,17,29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] World Health Organization (2022, December 01). World Malaria Report 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240040496.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] World Health Organization (2015). Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia (2022, December 01). Guía de Práctica Clínica Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de la Malaria, Available online: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ET/Guia-atencion-clinica-malaria.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Kashif, 2013, Reliability of rapid diagnostic test for diagnosing peripheral and placental malaria in an area of unstable malaria transmission in Eastern Sudan, Diagn. Pathol. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistopathology can classify placental tissue into acute active infection, chronic active infection, or past infection based on the inflammatory process, which PCR cannot detect because it does not identify hemozoin.
“Histopathology can also detect immune cell infiltrates and classify placental tissue into acute active infection (presence of parasites with little or no pigment), chronic active infection (presence of parasites and abundant pigment), or past infection (only presence of pigment) based on the inflammatory process, which PCR cannot detect because it does not identify hemozoin [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Campos, 2011, Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: Comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese parameters are only affected by the disease spectrum, so patients with clearly manifested disease have better outcomes.
“These parameters are only affected by the disease spectrum, so patients with clearly manifested disease have better outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eusebi, 2013, Diagnostic accuracy measures, Cerebrovasc. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOther studies have indicated that the diagnosis of CM is more complicated because it is an infection with low parasitic density in umbilical cord blood or peripheral blood of the newborn.
“Other studies have indicated that the diagnosis of CM is more complicated because it is an infection with low parasitic density in umbilical cord blood or peripheral blood of the newborn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Omer, 2020, Congenital malaria in newborns delivered to mothers with malaria-infected placenta in Blue Nile State, Sudan, J. Trop. Pediatr. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistopathology results depend on the quality of the sample, and formalin pigment can be confused with hemozoin, leading to diagnostic errors.
“its results depend on the quality of the sample, and the formalin pigment can be confused with hemozoin, leading to diagnostic errors [5,52,53,54]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [5] Liu, 2016, Diagnosis of placental malaria in poorly fixed and processed placental tissue, Malar. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] Fried, 2012, Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update, Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Takem, 2013, Malaria in pregnancy, Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Romagosa, 2004, Polarisation microscopy increases the sensitivity of hemozoin and Plasmodium detection in the histological assessment of placental malaria, Acta Trop. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSensitivity and specificity demonstrate the test's ability to detect positives and negatives without being affected by disease prevalence, implying that the results could be easily applied to settings with a different prevalence.
“sensitivity and specificity demonstrate the test’s ability to detect positives and negatives without being affected by disease prevalence, implying that the results could be easily applied to settings with a different prevalence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eusebi, 2013, Diagnostic accuracy measures, Cerebrovasc. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA study conducted in the same region compared TBS, nested PCR, and histopathology for the diagnosis of MM, discovering a sensitivity of 33% and a specificity of 95% for the TBS, whereas in nested PCR, these parameters were 47% and 77%, respectively, when compared to histopathology.
“a study conducted in the same region of this research compared the TBS, nested PCR, and histopathology for the diagnosis of MM, discovering a sensitivity of 33% and a specificity of 95% for the TBS, whereas in nested PCR, these parameters were 47% and 77%, respectively, when compared to histopathology [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Campos, 2011, Diagnosis of gestational, congenital, and placental malaria in Colombia: Comparison of the efficacy of microscopy, nested polymerase chain reaction, and histopathology, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is one of the few studies in the world that presents the thorough diagnostic parameters for clinical and epidemiological programs in a comprehensive manner.
“It is one of the few studies in the world that presents the thorough diagnostic parameters for clinical and epidemiological programs in a comprehensive manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenComprehensive analyses based on parasitemia levels were not conducted.
“comprehensive analyses based on parasitemia levels were not conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDetermination of parasitemia and classification are difficult and far from perfect; inaccurate diagnosis and classification have caused a high mortality rate, especially in children.
“determination of parasitemia and classification are difficult and far from perfect; inaccurate diagnosis and classification have caused a high mortality rate, especially in children [51,55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [51] Mayor, 2012, How hidden can malaria be in pregnant women? Diagnosis by microscopy, placental histology, polymerase chain reaction and detection of histidine-rich protein 2 in plasma, Clin Infect. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Rehman, 2018, Microscopic malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading on benchmark datasets, Microsc. Res. Tech. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis study showed satisfactory results for cases of GM caused by P. vivax and in pregnant women with previous malaria, expanding the evidence in favor of the use of this test in various clinical and epidemiological situations.
“this study showed satisfactory results for cases of GM caused by P. vivax and in pregnant women with previous malaria, expanding the evidence in favor of the use of this test in various clinical and epidemiological situations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEvidence was gathered to support the importance of active surveillance of MAP in Colombia, which requires more effort compared to passive detection because health workers must search for patients in the community.
“Evidence was gathered to support the importance of active surveillance of MAP in Colombia, which requires more effort compared to passive detection because health workers must search for patients in the community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCM is a poorly investigated event, and some authors believe that it is a disease with low occurrence, so there are many gaps in the literature.
“In general, CM is a poorly investigated event, and some authors believe that it is a disease with low occurrence, so there are many gaps in the literature [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 2016, Congenital malaria: Importance of diagnosis and treatment in pregnancy, Turk. J. Pediatr. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Colombian Ministry of Health recommendations validate both venipuncture and capillary blood samples.
“the Colombian Ministry of Health recommendations validate both types of samples [18]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Instituto Nacional de Salud de Colombia (2022, December 01). Manual Para el Diagnóstico de Malaria no Complicada en Puestos de Diagnóstico y Tratamiento, Available online: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/IA/INS/manual-diagnostico-malaria-no-complicada.pdf.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationTests with better sensitivity, such as molecular techniques, are required for CM.
“Therefore, tests with better sensitivity, such as molecular techniques, are required [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Omer, 2020, Congenital malaria in newborns delivered to mothers with malaria-infected placenta in Blue Nile State, Sudan, J. Trop. Pediatr. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIt assesses diagnostic ability in key subgroups according to symptoms, malaria history, and causal species and discusses the effect of the interaction of these factors on the accuracy of the TBS.
“It assesses diagnostic ability in key subgroups according to symptoms, malaria history, and causal species and discusses the effect of the interaction of these factors on the accuracy of the TBS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is Colombia's first study with a large sample size for the mother-placenta-neonate trinomial.
“It is Colombia’s first study with a large sample size for the mother–placenta–neonate trinomial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The qPCR reference standard correctly classifies malaria infection and species in pregnant women, placentas, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal blood.
“qPCR was used as a reference standard for diagnostic evaluation.”
“qPCR was used as the reference test in all cases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The non-probabilistic sampling and the fact that most samples were not from the same subjects do not bias the independent estimates of gestational, placental, and congenital malaria.
“In most cases the samples obtained were not from the same subjects (pregnant woman, placenta, umbilical cord and neonate), therefore the results of GM, PM and CM are analyzed independently.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The clinical history variables (febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria) accurately reflect the patients’ status.
“The following variables were extracted from the clinical history: febrile state, hemoglobin, and previous diagnosis of malaria (in the last year and in the current pregnancy).”
The paper relies on this without support.
TBS is commonly used in Colombia.
“This represents the population in Colombia, where the TBS is commonly used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The study population represents the population in Colombia.
“This represents the population in Colombia, where the TBS is commonly used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
qPCR is a valid reference standard for detecting malaria in pregnancy.
“In terms of qPCR, one of its limitations is its inability to determine the viability of the microorganism because it only detects genetic material and does not identify individuals with the ability to transmit the agent and cause new infections.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The possibility of detecting asymptomatic carriage of malaria is low in the case of the molecular diagnosis of MAP.
“it can be assumed that the possibility of detecting asymptomatic carriage of malaria is low in the case of the molecular diagnosis of MAP.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The absence of congenital malaria in India may be due to effective control measures or underreporting associated with diagnostic limitations.
“while the absence of congenital malaria in India may be due to effective control measures or underreporting associated with diagnostic limitations [191–193].”
From Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [191]
Section 4.3 (page unavailable) reports that thick blood smears detected no congenital malaria cases and explains why low parasite density can make diagnosis difficult; this supports diagnostic limitations as a possible source of missed cases. The paper studies Colombia and does not address an absence of congenital malaria in India or attribute it to effective control measures. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHigh prevalence rates of malaria occur in regions such as Niger and Sudan.
“High prevalence rates in regions such as Niger and Sudan underscore.the need for improved maternal screening and preventive measures”
From Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [191]
The Results report malaria test positivity among pregnant women studied in Colombia, not prevalence in Niger or Sudan. A References entry names a diagnostic study in Eastern Sudan but gives no prevalence figure; a search for Niger and Sudan found no passage establishing high prevalence in either country. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Febrile subgroup has conflicting negative predictive values
MinorThe results give a negative predictive value of 91% for febrile symptomatic women, whereas the discussion gives 92% for that subgroup.
“91% in febrile symptomatic women”
“in febrile symptomatic women (S = 96%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 92%; NLR = 0.04; and PPCD = 97%)”
Two negative predictive values reported for women with a history of malaria
MinorThe same summary of results for pregnant women with a history of malaria reports negative predictive values of both 100% and 76%.
“in pregnant women with a history of malaria (S = 69%; E = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 100%, NPV = 76%; NLR = 0.3; and PPCD = 84)”
“76% in pregnant women who had malaria in the last year”
Cites
The changing epidemiology of malaria elimination: New strategies for new challenges
Cotter, C., Sturrock, H. J., Hsiang, M. S., Liu, J., Phillips, A. A., Hwang, J., Gueye, C. S., Fullman, N., Gosling, R. D., & Feachem, R. G. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60310-4 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Reyburn, H., Mbakilwa, H., Mwangi, R., Mwerinde, O., Olomi, R. M., DRAKELEY, C. J., & Whitty, C. W. M. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39073.496829.ae · Cited by 435 · see citing works
“Asymptomatic” Malaria: A Chronic and Debilitating Infection That Should Be Treated
Chen, I., Clarke, S. E., Gosling, R., Hamainza, B., Killeen, G., Magill, A., O’Meara, W., Price, R. N., & Riley, E. M. (2016) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001942 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Targeting Asymptomatic Malaria Infections: Active Surveillance in Control and Elimination
Sturrock, H. J. W., Hsiang, M. S., Cohen, J. M., Smith, D. L., Greenhouse, B., Bousema, T., & Gosling, R. D. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001467 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Eusebi, P. (2013) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000353863 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Harris, I. E., Sharrock, W. W., Bain, L., Gray, K.-A., Bobogare, A., Boaz, L., Lilley, K., Krause, D., Vallely, A. J., Johnson, M., et al. (2010) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-254 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
The role of submicroscopic parasitemia in malaria transmission: What is the evidence?
Lin, J. T., Saunders, D. L., & Meshnick, S. R. (2014) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2014.02.004 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
A Research Agenda for Malaria Eradication: Diagnoses and Diagnostics
The malERA Consultative Group on Diagnoses and Diagnostics (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000396 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Cao, J., Sturrock, H. J. W., Cotter, C., Zhou, S., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Tang, L., Gosling, R. D., Feachem, R. G. A., & Gao, Q. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001642 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
New insights into malaria pathogenesis
Moxon, C. A., Gibbins, M. P., McGuinness, D., Milner, D. A., & Marti, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032640 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Takem, E. N., & D'Alessandro, U. (2013) · Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4084/mjhid.2013.010 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Ansah, E., Narh-Bana, S., Epokor, M., Akanpigbiam, S., Quartey, A. A., Gyapong, J. O., & Whitty, C. W. M. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c930 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
The impact of response to the results of diagnostic tests for malaria: cost-benefit analysis
Lubell, Y., Reyburn, H., Mbakilwa, H., Mwangi, R., Chonya, S., Whitty, C. W. M., & MILLS, A. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39395.696065.47 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Worldwide Incidence of Malaria in 2009: Estimates, Time Trends, and a Critique of Methods
Cibulskis, R. E., Aregawi, M. W., Williams, R. O., Otten, M. W., & Dye, C. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001142 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Nguyen, T.-N., von Seidlein, L., Nguyen, T.-V., Truong, P.-N., Hung, S. D., Pham, H.-T., Nguyen, T.-U., Le, T. D., Dao, V. H., Mukaka, M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30046-x · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Tiono, A. B., Ouédraogo, A., Ogutu, B., Diarra, A., Coulibaly, S., Gansané, A., Sirima, S. B., O’Neil, G., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Hamed, K. (2013) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-79 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Rogerson, S. J., Mkundika, P., & Kanjala, M. K. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.4.1370-1374.2003 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Epidemiology, drug resistance, and pathophysiology of <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> malaria
Gowda, D., Dayananda, K., & Achur, R. (2018) · Journal of Vector Borne Diseases · doi:10.4103/0972-9062.234620 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Mayor, A., Moro, L., Aguilar, R., Bardají, A., Cisteró, P., Serra-Casas, E., Sigaúque, B., Alonso, P. L., Ordi, J., & Menéndez, C. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis236 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view
Oyegoke, O. O., Maharaj, L., Akoniyon, O. P., Kwoji, I., Roux, A. T., Adewumi, T. S., Maharaj, R., Oyebola, B. T., Adeleke, M. A., & Okpeku, M. (2022) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-022-07512-9 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update
Fried, M., Muehlenbachs, A., & Duffy, P. E. (2012) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/eri.12.98 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Romagosa, C., Menendez, C., Ismail, M. R., Quintó, L., Ferrer, B., Alonso, P. L., & Ordi, J. (2004) · Acta Tropica · doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.02.003 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Campos, I. M., Uribe, M. L., Cuesta, C., Franco-Gallego, A., Carmona-Fonseca, J., & Maestre, A. (2011) · The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0507 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroscopic malaria parasitemia diagnosis and grading on benchmark datasets
Rehman, A., Abbas, N., Saba, T., Mehmood, Z., Mahmood, T., & Ahmed, K. T. (2018) · Microscopy Research and Technique · doi:10.1002/jemt.23071 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Carmona-Fonseca, J., & Maestre-B., A. (2009) · Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología · doi:10.18597/rcog.351 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in molecular diagnosis of malaria
(2017) · Advances in Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/bs.acc.2016.11.006 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Clinical Implications of Asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum Infections in Malawi
Buchwald, A. G., Sixpence, A., Chimenya, M., Damson, M., Sorkin, J. D., Wilson, M. L., Seydel, K. B., Hochman, S. E., Mathanga, D. P., Taylor, T. E., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy427 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ahmed, R., Levy, E. I., Maratina, S. S., de Jong, J. J., Asih, P. B. S., Rozi, I. E., Hawley, W., Syafruddin, D., & ter Kuile, F. (2015) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0943-5 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Umbers, A. J., Unger, H. W., Rosanas-Urgell, A., Wangnapi, R. A., Kattenberg, J. H., Jally, S., Silim, S., Lufele, E., Karl, S., Ome-Kaius, M., et al. (2015) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0927-5 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Enfoque clínico del síndrome febril agudo en Colombia
Cortés, J. A., Moreno, L. F. R., León, C. A. A., et al. (2017) · Infectio · doi:10.22354/in.v21i1.640 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of the prevalence of malaria associated with pregnancy in Colombia 2000–2020
Cardona-Arias, J. A., & Carmona-Fonseca, J. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255028 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationGavina, K., Gnidehou, S., Arango, E., Hamel-Martineau, C., Mitran, C., Agudelo, O., Lopez, C., Karidio, A., Banman, S., Carmona-Fonseca, J., et al. (2018) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00797-17 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationAplicación del valor umbral del número de ciclos (Ct) de PCR en la COVID-19
Serrano-Cumplido, A., Garcia, A. R., Segura‐Fragoso, A., Olmo-Quintana, V., Pérez, R. M. M., Barquilla-García, A., & Morán-Bayón, Á. (2021) · Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN · doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2021.05.003 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Agudelo-Garcia, O. M., Arango, E., & Carmona‐Fonseca, J. (2017) · Journal of Tropical Medicine · doi:10.1155/2017/3680758 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationKashif, A. H., Adam, G. K., Mohmmed, A. A., Elzaki, S. E., AbdelHalim, A. M., & Adam, I. (2013) · Diagnostic Pathology · doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-59 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Omer, S. A., Adam, I., Noureldien, A., Elhaj, H., Guerrero-Latorre, L., Silgado, A., Sulleiro, E., & Molina, I. (2020) · Journal of Tropical Pediatrics · doi:10.1093/tropej/fmz083 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
López-Guzmán, C., & Carmona-Fonseca, J. (2020) · Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública · doi:10.17843/rpmesp.2020.372.4759 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationCongenital malaria: Importance of diagnosis and treatment in pregnancy
Gülaşı, S., & Özdener, N. (2016) · The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.24953/turkjped.2016.02.011 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Diagnosis of placental malaria in poorly fixed and processed placental tissue
Liu, Y., Griffin, J. B., Muehlenbachs, A., Rogerson, S. J., Bailis, A. J., Sharma, R., Sullivan, D. J., Tshefu, A. K., Landis, S. H., Kabongo, J.-M. M., et al. (2016) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1314-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Overprescribing of antimalarials
Sansom, C. (2009) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70247-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cortés, L. J., & Guerra, Á. P. (2020) · Biomédica · doi:10.7705/biomedica.4893 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Epidemiology of Malaria in Colombia: a heretical view
Carmona‐Fonseca, J. (2020) · Social medicine · doi:10.71164/socialmedicine.v13i2.2020.1237 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationCarmona-Fonseca, J., & Cardona-Arias, J. A. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263092 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCongenital malaria: Frequency and epidemiology in Colombia, 2009-2020
Cardona‐Arias, J. A., & Carmona‐Fonseca, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263451 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationFrequency of gestational malaria and maternal–neonatal outcomes, in Northwestern Colombia 2009–2020
Cardona‐Arias, J. A., & Carmona‐Fonseca, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15011-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationCardona-Arias, J. A., & Carmona-Fonseca, J. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268949 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationSOLARI SOTO, L., SOTO TARAZONA, A., MENDOZA REQUENA, D., & LLANOS CUENTAS, A. (2013) · Revista Médica Herediana · doi:10.20453/rmh.v13i4.689 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Overview of Epidemiology of Malaria Associated with Pregnancy in Northwestern Colombia, 1985-2020
Cardona‐Arias, J. A. (2021) · JOURNAL OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES · doi:10.24321/0019.5138.202184 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2014, Malaria and pregnancy: Complications, prevention and treatment, Prog. Obstet. Ginecol., 57, 468
- Malaria Policy Advisory Group World Health Organization (2017). Meeting Report of the Evidence Review Group on Malaria in Pregnancy, Geneva, Switzerland, 9–11 July 2017, World Health Organization.
- Guerra, 2020, Concordance analysis of three diagnostic tests for malaria in the symptomatic population of Colombian endemic municipalities, Biomedica, 40, 117
- Carmona, 2017, La Región “Urabá Antioqueño-Cuencas altas de los ríos Sinú y San Jorge-Bajo Cauca Antioqueño”: “guarida” del paludismo colombiano Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander, Salud, 49, 577
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review
Minwuyelet, A., Yewhalaw, D., Siferih, M., & Atenafu, G. (2025) · Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines · doi:10.1186/s40794-025-00248-1 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Prospective study of malaria in pregnancy, placental and congenital malaria in Northwest Colombia
Cardona-Arias, J. A., & Carmona-Fonseca, J. (2024) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-024-04948-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Cardona-Arias, J. A., Higuita Gutiérrez, L. F., & Carmona-Fonseca, J.
- Affiliations
- Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia
- Grupo Salud y Comunidad César Uribe Piedrahíta, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-02-14
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119
- ISSN
- 2414-6366 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9959527
- OpenAlex
- W4320919970
- Semantic Scholar
- 7b1d215da45265b88043605c164963e46eb48ffb
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Antioquia (INV3161)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- malaria in pregnancy, placental malaria, congenital malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, thick blood smear, qPCR, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, umbilical cord blood, Colombia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review