Cited by 28RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryVirus-based gene therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Immunogenicity of intrathecal plasmid gene delivery: cytokine release and effects on transgene expression

Open access
Hughes, Travis S., Langer, Stephen J., Virtanen, Salla I., Chavez, Raymond A., Watkins, Linda R., Milligan, Erin D., Leinwand, Leslie A.·2009·The Journal of Gene Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One method for the delivery of therapeutic proteins to the spinal cord is to inject nonviral gene vectors including plasmid DNA into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that surrounds the spinal cord (intrathecal space). This approach has produced therapeutic benefits in animal models of disease and several months of protein expression; however, there is little information available on the immune response to these treatments in the intrathecal space, the relevance of plasmid CpG sequences to any plasmid-induced immune response, or the effect of this immune response on transgene expression. METHODS: In the present study, coding or noncoding plasmids were delivered to the intrathecal space of the lumbar spinal region in rats. Lumbosacral CSF was then collected at various time points afterwards for monitoring of cytokines and transgene expression. RESULTS: This work demonstrates, for the first time, increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 in response to intrathecal plasmid vector injection and provides evidence indicating that this response is largely absent in a CpG-depleted vector. Transgene expression in the CSF is not significantly affected by this immune response. Expression after intrathecal plasmid injection is variable across rats but correlates with the amount of tissue associated plasmid and is increased by disrupting normal CSF flow. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in the present study indicate that plasmid immunogenicity may affect intrathecal plasmid gene therapy safety but not transgene expression in the CSF. Furthermore, the development of methods to prevent loss of plasmid via CSF flow out of the central nervous system through the injection hole and/or natural outflow routes may increase intrathecal plasmid gene delivery efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgm.1364

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plasmid-based expression often leads to a longer duration of Cas9 protein, which may result in higher off-target effects and strong immune responses.

    “In addition, the plasmid-based expression often leads to a longer duration of Cas9 protein, which may result in higher off-target effects and strong immune responses [95].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, T. S., Langer, S. J., Virtanen, S. I., Chavez, R. A., Watkins, L. R., Milligan, E. D., & Leinwand, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Leinwand, Leslie A.
Venue
The Journal of Gene Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-16
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
782-790
ISSN
  • 1099-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-2254
OpenAlex
W1990187837
Cited by
28
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Gene Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02DA015642, DA024044, DA 015642, R01DA018156, K05DA024044, DA 018156)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 29090, R01GM029090)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
intrathecal gene delivery, plasmid DNA, immunogenicity, cytokine production, TNF-α, interleukin-1, CpG sequences, transgene expression, cerebrospinal fluid, lumbar spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid flow, non-viral vectors, gene therapy safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Injections, Spinal, Male, Plasmids, Transfection, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Cytokines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, CpG Islands, Transgenes, Toll-Like Receptor 9, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review