Cited by 260Animal testing and alternativesMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments: The ARRIVE Guidelines

Open access
Kilkenny, Carol, Browne, William, Cuthill, Innes C, Emerson, Michael, Altman, Douglas G·2010·The Journal of Gene Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgm.1473

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.

    “The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G.
Affiliations
  • National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kilkenny, Carol
Venue
The Journal of Gene Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
561-563
ISSN
  • 1099-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-2254
OpenAlex
W2083179636
Cited by
256
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Gene Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
ARRIVE guidelines, animal studies, in vivo experiments, reporting guidelines, animal experimentation, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Quality Control, Research Design, Animal Experimentation, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review