Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring polyethylenimine‐mediated DNA transfection and the proton sponge hypothesis

Akinc, Akin, Thomas, Mini, Klibanov, Alexander M., Langer, Robert·2005·The Journal of Gene Medicine

Abstract

Background: The relatively high transfection efficiency of polyethylenimine (PEI) vectors has been hypothesized to be due to their ability to avoid trafficking to degradative lysosomes. According to the proton sponge hypothesis, the buffering capacity of PEI leads to osmotic swelling and rupture of endosomes, resulting in the release of the vector into the cytoplasm. Methods: The mechanism of PEI‐mediated DNA transfer was investigated using quantitative methods to study individual steps in the overall transfection process. In addition to transfection efficiency, the cellular uptake, local pH environment, and stability of vectors were analyzed. N‐Quaternized (and therefore non‐proton sponge) versions of PEI and specific cell function inhibitors were used to further probe the proton sponge hypothesis. Results: Both N‐quaternization and the use of bafilomycin A1 (a vacuolar proton pump inhibitor) reduced the transfection efficiency of PEI by approximately two orders of magnitude. Chloroquine, which buffers lysosomes, enhanced the transfection efficiency of N‐quaternized PEIs and polylysine by 2–3‐fold. In contrast, chloroquine did not improve the transfection efficiency of PEI. The measured average pH environment of PEI vectors was 6.1, indicating that they successfully avoid trafficking to acidic lysosomes. Significantly lower average pH environments were observed for permethyl‐PEI (pH 5.4), perethyl‐PEI (pH 5.1), and polylysine (pH 4.6) vectors. Cellular uptake levels of permethyl‐PEI and perethyl‐PEI vectors were found to be 20 and 90% higher, respectively, than that of parent PEI vectors, indicating that the reduction in transfection activity of the N‐quaternized PEIs is due to a barrier downstream of cellular uptake. A polycation/DNA‐binding affinity assessment showed that the more charge dense N‐quaternized PEIs bind DNA less tightly than PEI, demonstrating that poor vector unpackaging was not responsible for the reduced transfection activity of the N‐quaternized PEIs. Conclusions: The results obtained are consistent with the proton sponge hypothesis and strongly suggest that the transfection activity of PEI vectors is due to their unique ability to avoid acidic lysosomes. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgm.696

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,337

Metadata

Authors
Akinc, A., Thomas, M., Klibanov, A. M., & Langer, R.
Venue
The Journal of Gene Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-15
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
657-663
ISSN
  • 1099-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-2254
OpenAlex
W1995956587
Cited by
1,337
References
1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.