The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Macrophage Subset Repopulation in the Spleen: Differential Kinetics After Liposome-Mediated Elimination
Abstract
Different macrophage subsets can be discriminated in the well defined compartments of the mouse spleen by specialized functions and the presence of specific surface determinants. Red pulp macrophages, marginal zone macrophages, and marginal metallophilic macrophages are eliminated simultaneously within 24 hr by a single injection with liposome-entrapped dichloromethylene diphosphonate (DMDP). After such elimination, these subsets show a striking difference in their kinetics of reappearance: Red pulp macrophages are back in normal numbers after 1 week, the marginal metallophilic macrophages take 2 weeks to regain fully their position at the border of the marginal zone and periarteriolar lymphocyte sheath, but it takes over 1 month for complete reappearance of the marginal zone macrophages. Marginal zone lymphocytes, also affected by treatment with the liposome-entrapped drug, reappeared in the marginal zone within 2 weeks, indicating that marginal zone macrophages are not required for their localization and/or retention there. Approximately 2 weeks after treatment, all cells in the spleen have returned to normal numbers with the exception of marginal zone macrophages, which can be found only sporadically at that time. The results indicate that these macrophage subpopulations must have different precursor requirements. The differential reappearance of the macrophages creates the possibility of studying lineage analysis and will help to unravel the precise function of the marginal zone macrophages and marginal metallophilic macrophages in particular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190
Subpopulations of Mouse Blood Monocytes Differ in Maturation Stage and Inflammatory Response
Sunderkötter, C., Nikolic, T., Dillon, M. J., van Rooijen, N., Stehling, M., Drevets, D. A., & Leenen, P. J. M. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4410 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationThe liposome-mediated macrophage ‘suicide’ technique
Van Rooijen, N. (1989) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(89)90178-6 · Cited by 441
Self-citationLiposomes for Specific Depletion of Macrophages from Organs and Tissues
van Rooijen, N., & Hendrikx, E. (2010) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-360-2_13 · Cited by 379
Self-citationStudying the mononuclear phagocyte system in the molecular age
Chow, A., Brown, B. D., & Merad, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3087 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rooijen, N., Kors, N., & Kraal, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Leukocyte Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-104
- ISSN
- 0741-5400 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3673
- OpenAlex
- W2126696395
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage Subset Repopulation in the Spleen: Differential Kinetics After Liposome-Mediated Elimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jlb.45.2.97
- The paper
- van Rooijen, N., Kors, N., & Kraal, G. (1989). Macrophage Subset Repopulation in the Spleen: Differential Kinetics After Liposome-Mediated Elimination. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.45.2.97
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.