The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First‐pass contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)‐based blood pool agent
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of first‐pass contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using ferumoxytol in humans. Materials and Methods: First‐pass and equilibrium phase MRA were performed using ferumoxytol in one healthy volunteer and 11 patients with a fast three‐dimensional spoiled gradient recalled (SPGR) pulse sequence. The examined vessels included carotid arteries, thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and peripheral arteries. A dose of either 71.6 μmol Fe/kg (n = 9), or 35.8 μmol Fe/kg (n = 3) was used. Based on a phantom study, the agent with initial concentration of 537.2 μmol Fe/mL was diluted by either four‐fold (134.3 μmol Fe/mL) or eight‐fold (67.1 μmol Fe/mL) for first‐pass MRA. Results: All subjects completed their studies without adverse events. First‐pass MRA showed selective arterial enhancement, with both arterial and venous enhancement on delayed acquisitions. Selective venous enhancement could be obtained by subtraction of arterial phase images from equilibrium phase images. The findings in ferumoxytol MRA were consistent with the results of original vascular tests. Conclusion: Our preliminary experience supports the feasibility of first‐pass MRA with ferumoxytol. Satisfactory arterial enhancement during first‐pass imaging is obtained with injection of diluted contrast agent. With ferumoxytol, arteries and veins can be selectively depicted in a single exam. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;21:46–52. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blood Pool MR Angiography of Aortic Stent-Graft Endoleak
Ersoy, H., Jacobs, P., Kent, C. K., & Prince, M. R. (2004) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821181 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Ulbrich, K., Holá, K., Šubr, V., Bakandritsos, A., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589 · Cited by 1,730
Lee, N., & Hyeon, T. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15248c · Cited by 995
In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles
Arami, H., Khandhar, A., Liggitt, D., & Krishnan, K. M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00541h · Cited by 830
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: from preparations to in vivo MRI applications
Qiao, R., Yang, C., & Gao, M. (2009) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b902394a · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Tutton, S., Vu, A. T., Pierchala, L., Li, B. S. Y., Lewis, J. M., Prasad, P. V., & Edelman, R. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-52
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2015182248
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First‐pass contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)‐based blood pool agent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.20235
- The paper
- Li, W., Tutton, S., Vu, A. T., Pierchala, L., Li, B. S. Y., Lewis, J. M., Prasad, P. V., & Edelman, R. R. (2005). First‐pass contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)‐based blood pool agent. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.