The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coating thickness of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles affects R2 relaxivity
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of coating thickness on the relaxivity of iron oxide nanoparticles. Materials and Methods: Monocrystalline superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs), coated with a polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐modified, phospholipid micelle coating, with different PEG molecular weights, were prepared. The particle diameters were measured with dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electron microscopy (EM). The R 1 and R 2 of MIONs were measured using a bench‐top nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometer. pH was varied for some measurements. Monte Carlo simulations of proton movement in a field with nanometer‐sized magnetic inhomogeneities were performed. Results: Increasing the molecular weight of the PEG portion of the micelle coating increased overall particle diameter. As coating thickness increases, the R 2 decreases and the R 1 increases. Changing pH has no effect on relaxivity. The Monte Carlo simulations suggest that the effect of coating size on R 2 relaxivity is determined by two competing factors: the physical exclusion of protons from the magnetic field and the residence time for protons within the coating zone. Conclusion: Coating thickness can significantly impact the R 2, and the R 2/R 1 ratio, of a MION contrast agent. An understanding of the relationship between coating properties and changes in relaxivity is critical for designing magnetic nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging applications using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Polymeric micelles—A new generation of colloidal drug carriers
Jones, M.-C., & Leroux, J.-C. (1999) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00039-9 · Cited by 1,256
Cited by
Lee, N., & Hyeon, T. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15248c · Cited by 995
Tuning the Magnetic Properties of Nanoparticles
Kolhatkar, A., Jamison, A., Litvinov, D., Willson, R., & Lee, T. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140815977 · Cited by 820
Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents
Busquets, M. A., Estelrich, J., & Sánchez-Martín, M. J. (2015) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s76501 · Cited by 622
The design and utility of polymer-stabilized iron-oxide nanoparticles for nanomedicine applications
Boyer, C., Whittaker, M. R., Bulmus, V., Liu, J., & Davis, T. P. (2010) · NPG Asia Materials · doi:10.1038/asiamat.2010.6 · Cited by 447
Kandasamy, G., & Maity, D. (2015) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.058 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- LaConte, L. E. W., Nitin, N., Zurkiya, O., Caruntu, D., O'Connor, C. J., Hu, X., & Bao, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1634-1641
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2069943212
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coating thickness of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles affects R2 relaxivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.21194
- The paper
- LaConte, L. E. W., Nitin, N., Zurkiya, O., Caruntu, D., O'Connor, C. J., Hu, X., & Bao, G. (2007). Coating thickness of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles affects R2 relaxivity. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.