The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MRI contrast agents: Basic chemistry and safety
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are pharmaceuticals used widely in MRI examinations. Gadolinium‐based MRI contrast agents (GBCAs) are by far the most commonly used. To date, nine GBCAs have been commercialized for clinical use, primarily indicated in the central nervous system, vasculature, and whole body. GBCAs primarily lower the T 1 in vivo to create higher signal in T 1‐weighted MRI scans where GBCAs are concentrated. GBCAs are unique among pharmaceuticals, being water proton relaxation catalysts whose effectiveness is characterized by a rate constant known as relaxivity. The relaxivity of each GBCAs depends on a variety of factors that are discussed in terms of both the existing agents and future molecular imaging agents under study by current researchers. Current GBCAs can be divided into four different structural types (macrocyclic, linear, ionic, and nonionic) based on the chemistry of the chelating ligands whose primary purpose is to protect the body from dissociation of the relatively toxic Gd 3+ ion from the ligand. This article discusses how the chemical structure influences inherent and in vivo stability toward dissociation, and how it affects important formulation properties. Although GBCAs have a lower rate of serious adverse events than iodinated contrast agents, they still present some risk. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:1060–1071. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical Safety and Diagnostic Value of the Gadolinium Chelate Gadoterate Meglumine (Gd-DOTA)
Herborn, C. U., Honold, E., Wolf, M., Kemper, J., Kinner, S., Adam, G., & Barkhausen, J. (2007) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000248893.01067.e5 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging
McDonald, R. J., McDonald, J. S., Kallmes, D. F., Jentoft, M. E., Murray, D. L., Thielen, K. R., Williamson, E. E., & Eckel, L. J. (2015) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.15150025 · Cited by 1,358
Kanda, T., Fukusato, T., Matsuda, M., Toyoda, K., Oba, H., Kotoku, J., Haruyama, T., Kitajima, K., & Furui, S. (2015) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142690 · Cited by 874
Ghasemian, M., Kazeminava, F., Naseri, A., Mohebzadeh, S., Abbaszadeh, M., Kafil, H. S., & Ahmadian, Z. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115328 · Cited by 55
Adaptive Learning in AI Agents for the Metaverse: The ALMAA Framework
Xia, Y., Shin, S.-Y., & Lee, H.-A. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142311410 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hao, D., Ai, T., Goerner, F., Hu, X., Runge, V. M., & Tweedle, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-22
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1060-1071
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2111481358
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI contrast agents: Basic chemistry and safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.23725
- The paper
- Hao, D., Ai, T., Goerner, F., Hu, X., Runge, V. M., & Tweedle, M. (2012). MRI contrast agents: Basic chemistry and safety. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.