Cited by 10Music Therapy and HealthCancer survivorship and careDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

A systematic review of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce procedural anxiety among patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer

Open access
Forbes, Erin, Baker, Amanda L., Britton, Ben, Clover, Kerrie, Skelton, Eliza, Moore, Lyndell, Handley, Tonelle, Oultram, Sharon +3 more·2023·Cancer Medicine

Abstract

Procedural anxiety is a concern for a number of patients undergoing radiation therapy. While procedural anxiety is often treated pharmacologically, there is a clinical need for effective alternative strategies for patients who are contraindicated from medication use, and those who prefer not to take unnecessary medications. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions delivered to adults with cancer, in the radiation oncology department, just prior to, or during radiation therapy, in reducing levels of self-reported procedural anxiety. The secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy of these interventions in reducing physiological symptoms of procedural anxiety and anxiety-related treatment disruptions. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from inception up until February 2022. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Population: Adult patients with cancer undergoing external beam radiation therapy. INTERVENTION: Nonpharmacological interventions delivered within the radiation therapy department. Comparison: standard care controls, or standard care plus an alternative intervention. OUTCOMES: level of self-reported procedural anxiety (primary), physiological symptoms of anxiety (secondary) and measures of anxiety-related treatment disruptions (secondary). DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. A meta-analysis was originally planned but deemed not feasible as the studies could not be confidently pooled for meta-analysis, due to the variability in the interventions, study designs and the generally low number of studies. Therefore, a narrative synthesis is presented. RESULTS: Screening of 2363 records identified nine studies that met inclusion criteria: six studies of music interventions, two of video-based patient education and one of aromatherapy. Overall, three studies received a global rating of strong methodological quality and low risk of bias. Three studies reported a significant effect of the intervention on reducing the primary outcome of self-reported procedural anxiety: two music interventions (both strong methodological quality), and one video-based patient education (moderate methodological quality). One of the studies (a music intervention) also reported a significant reduction in the secondary outcome of physiological symptoms of procedural anxiety (systolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for nonpharmacological interventions delivered to adults with cancer just prior to, or during radiation therapy, in reducing levels of self-reported procedural anxiety is limited, with very few well-designed studies. There is a need for interventions for procedural anxiety during radiation therapy to be evaluated through rigorous randomised controlled trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cam4.6573

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Australian Institue of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2021. Supplementary tables for Chapter 5: Number of new cancer cases. 2021.
  2. [3]Australian Institue of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2021. Supplementary tables for Chapter 6: Treatment. 2021.
  3. [10]Choy Y. Acute Procedure Anxiety in Adults: Course, Screening, Assessment, and Differential Diagnosis: UpToDate. Wolters Kluwer; 2019 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/acute‐procedure‐anxiety‐in‐adults‐course‐screening‐assessment‐and‐differential‐diagnosis.
  4. [21]Koth J, Coutu B, Bartenhagen L, et al. Assessing anxiety alleviation through an informational video before head and neck irradiation. Radiat Ther. 2021; 30(2): 153‐ 162.
  5. [63]Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. John Wiley and Sons; 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes, E., Baker, A. L., Britton, B., Clover, K., Skelton, E., Moore, L., Handley, T., Oultram, S., Oldmeadow, C., Gibberd, A., & McCarter, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Forbes, Erin
Venue
Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10
Volume
12
Issue
20
Pages
20396-20422
ISSN
2045-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387421017
Cited by
10
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
procedural anxiety, non-pharmacological treatment, radiotherapy, cancer patients, music intervention, video-based patient education, aromatherapy, systolic blood pressure, treatment interruption, external beam radiotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Blood Pressure, Humans, Neoplasms, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review