The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from post‐mortem human cortex
Open accessAbstract
Post‐mortem human brain tissue represents a vast potential source of neural progenitor cells for use in basic research as well as therapeutic applications. Here we describe five human neural progenitor cell cultures derived from cortical tissue harvested from premature infants. Time‐lapse videomicrography of the passaged cultures revealed them to be highly dynamic, with high motility and extensive, evanescent intercellular contacts. Karyotyping revealed normal chromosomal complements. Prior to differentiation, most of the cells were nestin, Sox2, vimentin, and/or GFAP positive, and a subpopulation was doublecortin positive. Multilineage potential of these cells was demonstrated after differentiation, with some subpopulations of cells expressing the neuronal markers β‐tubulin, MAP2ab, NeuN, FMRP, and Tau and others expressing the oligodendroglial marker O1. Still other cells expressed the classic glial marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). RT‐PCR confirmed nestin, SOX2, GFAP, and doublecortin expression and also showed epidermal growth factor receptor and nucleostemin expression during the expansion phase. Flow cytometry showed high levels of the neural stem cell markers CD133, CD44, CD81, CD184, CD90, and CD29. CD133 markedly decreased in high‐passage, lineage‐restricted cultures. Electrophysiological analysis after differentiation demonstrated that the majority of cells with neuronal morphology expressed voltage‐gated sodium and potassium currents. These data suggest that post‐mortem human brain tissue is an important source of neural progenitor cells that will be useful for analysis of neural differentiation and for transplantation studies. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain
Doetsch, F., Caillé, I., Lim, D. A., García-Verdugo, J. M., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80783-7 · Cited by 3,898
CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein
Lendahl, U., Zimmerman, L. B., & McKay, R. D. G. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90662-x · Cited by 3,151
Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells
Uchida, N., Buck, D. W., He, D., Reitsma, M. J., Masek, M., Phan, T. V., Tsukamoto, A. S., Gage, F. H., & Weissman, I. L. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.26.14720 · Cited by 1,849
Stem Cells in the Central Nervous System
McKay, R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.66 · Cited by 1,472
Reynolds, B. A., & Weiss, S. (1996) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.1996.0090 · Cited by 1,360
The Adult Rat Hippocampus Contains Primordial Neural Stem Cells
Palmer, T. D., Takahashi, J., & Gage, F. H. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1006/mcne.1996.0595 · Cited by 1,090
Gritti, A., Parati, E., Cova, L., Frolichsthal, P., Galli, R., Wanke, E., Faravelli, L., Morassutti, D., Roisen, F., Nickel, D., et al. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-01091.1996 · Cited by 1,030
Cell replacement therapies for central nervous system disorders
Björklund, A., & Lindvall, O. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/75705 · Cited by 934
Flax, J. D., Aurora, S., Yang, C., Simonin, C., Wills, A. M., Billinghurst, L. L., Jendoubi, M., Sidman, R. L., Wolfe, J. H., Kim, S. U., et al. (1998) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/3473 · Cited by 770
Identification of a multipotent astrocytic stem cell in the immature and adult mouse brain
Laywell, E. D., Rakic, P., Kukekov, V. G., Holland, E. C., & Steindler, D. A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.250471697 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Stretch-activated ion channel Piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells
Pathak, M. M., Nourse, J. L., Tran, T., Hwe, J., Arulmoli, J., Le, D. T. T., Bernardis, E., Flanagan, L. A., & Tombola, F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1409802111 · Cited by 657
Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines
Müller, F.-J., Laurent, L. C., Kostka, D., Ulitsky, I., Williams, R., Lu, C., Park, I.-H., Rao, M. S., Shamir, R., Schwartz, P. H., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07213 · Cited by 343
Self-citationHong, S., Yang, K., Kang, B., Lee, C., Song, I. T., Byun, E., Park, K. I., Cho, S., & Lee, H. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201202365 · Cited by 291
Regulation of human neural precursor cells by laminin and integrins
Flanagan, L. A., Rebaza, L. M., Derzic, S., Schwartz, P. H., & Monuki, E. S. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20778 · Cited by 280
Self-citationAberrant differentiation of glutamatergic cells in neocortex of mouse model for fragile X syndrome.
Tervonen, T. A., Louhivuori, V., Sun, X., Hokkanen, M.-E., Kratochwil, C. F., Zebryk, P., Castrén, E., & Castrén, M. L. (2009) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2008.10.010 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, P. H., Bryant, P. J., Fuja, T. J., Su, H., O'Dowd, D. K., & Klassen, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-05
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 838-851
- ISSN
- 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4547
- OpenAlex
- W1979964850
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from post‐mortem human cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jnr.10854
- The paper
- Schwartz, P. H., Bryant, P. J., Fuja, T. J., Su, H., O'Dowd, D. K., & Klassen, H. (2003). Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from post‐mortem human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
