Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal TIMP‐1 release accompanies astrocytic MMP‐9 secretion and enhances astrocyte proliferation induced by β‐amyloid 25–35 fragment

Hernández‐Guillamon, Mar, Delgado, Pilar, Ortega, Laura, Pares, Mireia, Rosell, Anna, García‐Bonilla, Lidia, Fernández‐Cadenas, Israel, Borrell‐Pagès, Maria, Boada, Mercè, Montaner, Joan·2009·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

The neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accompanied by an inflammatory response that includes neurodegeneration and glial reactivity. Tissue remodeling proteins, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their endogenous tissue inhibitors (TIMPs), are inflammatory mediators that might play a dual role in the AD brain. We aimed to investigate the effects of β‐amyloid (Abeta) on the MMP‐9/TIMP‐1 balance and its involvement in Abeta toxicity in neurons and glial cells. Our results demonstrate that the neurotoxic 25–35 Abeta fragment induces the activation of MMP‐9 and the increase of proMMP‐2/9 secretion and promotes the release of TIMP‐1 in a mixed cortical neuroglial culture. The same treatments performed in pure neuronal or astrocytic cultures confirm that astroglial cells are the major source of MMP‐9, whereas increased TIMP‐1 levels have a neuronal origin. Moreover, 25–35 Abeta fragment not only induced a release of these molecules but also caused expressional changes in MMP‐9 and TIMP‐1, correlated with the neurotoxicity process. We also show that TIMP‐1 promoted cell proliferation in a mixed neuroglial culture, and we confirm this effect in primary cultured astrocytes induced by rTIMP‐1 and 25–35 Abeta. Because the proliferative effect caused by Abeta 25–35 was enhanced by the presence of TIMP‐1, we suggest that the astroglial reactivity induced by chronic exposure of the peptide might be mediated in part by TIMP‐1, which is secreted mainly by injured neurons. In conclusion, our data suggest that the Abeta 25–35 fragment stimulates the MMP‐9–TIMP‐1 pathway, promoting gliosis, in a self‐defensive attempt to eliminate amyloid deposition from AD brains. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.22034

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Anthony DC, 1997, Differential matrix metalloproteinase expression in cases of multiple sclerosis and stroke, Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 5, 406, 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1997.tb01315.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90380-R · DOI
  3. Asahina M, 2001, Expression of matrix metalloproteinase‐9 and urokinase‐type plasminogen activator in Alzheimer's disease brain, Clin Neuropathol, 20, 60
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00897.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0167-4838(99)00279-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00859-8 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603378 · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66041641.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02344-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07736.1997 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0230450100 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-08-03510.1993 · DOI
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1563-05.2005 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.041 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1072994 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80015-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0196-9781(95)00021-B · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01804-1 · DOI
  19. Iwata N, 2000, Identification of the major Abeta1–42‐degrading catabolic pathway in brain parenchyma: suppression leads to biochemical and pathological deposition, Nat Med, 6, 43, 10.1038/72237 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02876.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04426.x · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01745.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00387-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.jns.2004.11.041 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.050 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00398-2 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0197-0186(03)00004-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.027 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00132-8 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1186/1471-2202-6-68 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1097/00005072-199501000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64010253.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04223.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01838.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2872 · DOI
  36. 10.1161/01.STR.0000223001.06264.af · DOI
  37. 10.1038/399a023 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S1044-7431(02)00024-6 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03102.x · DOI
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2085-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/35081571 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hernández‐Guillamon, M., Delgado, P., Ortega, L., Pares, M., Rosell, A., García‐Bonilla, L., Fernández‐Cadenas, I., Borrell‐Pagès, M., Boada, M., & Montaner, J.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-23
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
2115-2125
ISSN
  • 0360-4012
  • 1097-4547
Cited by
39
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review