CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alzheimer's β‐amyloid peptide specifically interacts with and is degraded by insulin degrading enzyme

Kurochkin, Igor V., Goto, Sataro·1994·FEBS Letters
DOI 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00387-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cerebral deposition of β‐amyloid peptide (βA) is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Concentration of βA could play a critical role in the rate of amyloid deposition. It is therefore of considerable importance to identify proteases involved in processing of βA. 125 I‐labeled synthetic βA specifically cross‐linked to a single protein with M r = 110,000 in cytosol fractions from rat brain and liver. This protein was identified as insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) since the labeling of the 110 kDa protein was completely blocked by an excess of insulin, and anti‐IDE monoclonal antibodies precipitated the labeled protein. Purified rat IDE effectively degraded βA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00387-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/S0006-291X(84)80190-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4245 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb08501.x · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.3810169 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/357500a0 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1738847 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/361260a0 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9513 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4147 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)77951-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16374.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)47058-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.004503 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF00276849 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0006-291X(87)80243-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90106-T · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6953 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)88807-X · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48431-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)50049-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10540 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb04948.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1042/bj2881053 · DOI
  25. 10.2337/diab.40.4.436 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kurochkin, I. V., & Goto, S.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-05-23
Volume
345
Issue
1
Pages
33-37
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
DOI
10.1016/0014-5793(94)00387-4
Cited by
340
References
4
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 2706 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review