The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From causes to conditions in group research
Open accessAbstract
Summary: It is time to move beyond standard conceptual and research paradigms in scientific work on group behavior and performance to better align our models and methods with the phenomena we are studying. Cause–effect models are of limited use in conducting research and generating useable theory about group behavior and performance. This paper proposes and illustrates an alternative conceptual approach that focuses on the conditions within which groups chart their own courses. The paper suggests three implications of a condition‐focused approach for those who create, lead, and serve in purposive groups, and closes with a discussion of the conceptual challenges that must be overcome if the potential of a condition‐focused approach is to be realized. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, there are well-established theories of team effectiveness that could inform hypotheses about how specific team constructs affect implementation [104–107].”
From Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [104]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Self-citationDevelopmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366 · Cited by 3,582
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.
Müller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · Cited by 3,435
TIME AN TRANSITION IN WORK TEAMS: TOWARD A NEW MODEL OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256496 · Cited by 2,338
Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1205 · Cited by 2,312
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Handbook of Organizational Behavior
Price, R., D’Aunno, T. A., & Lorsch, J. W. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070561 · Cited by 2,241
Hackman, J. R., & Lorsch, J. R. (1987) · Cited by 2,151
Self-citationSimon, H. A. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245 · Cited by 2,000
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Arrow H., 2000, Small groups as complex systems
- Flight Safety Foundation, 2000, FSF ALAR briefing note 7.1—Stabilized approach, Flight Safety Digest, 133
- 10.2307/256496 · DOI
- Gigerenzer G., 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart, 3
- 10.5465/amr.2005.16387885 · DOI
- Herbst P. G., 1974, Sociotechnical design
- McGrath J. E., 1962, Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training
- 10.1287/orsc.12.5.559.10094 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B., & Busenitz, L. W. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313493325 · Cited by 664
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N. J., Barron, A. H., & Schelble, B. G. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 681
Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377 · Cited by 444
Inspired to perform: A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work
Walumbwa, F. O., Muchiri, M. K., Misati, E., Wu, C., & Meiliani, M. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2216 · Cited by 323
Foundations of teamwork and collaboration.
Driskell, J. E., Salas, E., & Driskell, T. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000241 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackman, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hackman, J. Richard
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 428-444
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W1593258641
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 22.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- group behavior, group performance, causal models, group dynamics, group leadership, group development, conceptual model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
