The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The moderating role of social ties on entrepreneurs' depressed affect and withdrawal intentions in response to economic stress
Abstract
Summary: We explored whether contact with business‐related social ties would buffer entrepreneurs against the potentially deleterious effects of economic stress. Our proposed stress‐buffering model builds on the premise that social ties with similar others can serve as both a source of valuable information and a source of empathic support. Findings from a sample of 262 entrepreneurs revealed that the relation between economic stress and intentions to withdraw from entrepreneurial opportunities was stronger among individuals reporting less contact with social ties and weaker among those who reported more contact with social ties. We further examined the indirect effects of economic stress and contact with business‐related social ties on entrepreneurs' future intentions through depressed affect. Results showed that among those reporting less contact with social ties, the indirect effect is positive, meaning greater economic stress leads to higher depressed affect, which in turn results in greater intentions to withdraw from entrepreneurship. Among those with more contact with social ties, there is no evidence of this process at work. We interpret this to mean that social ties serve to buffer the impact of economic stress on depressed affect, which in turn reduces an entrepreneur's intention to withdraw from entrepreneurship. Those who seem most susceptible to the impact of economic stress are those with relatively limited contact with business‐related social ties. We discuss implications and directions for future research. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Self-citationAddressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Self-citationBeyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
Self-citationA comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688
BERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538
Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What Next?
Thoits, P. A. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626957 · Cited by 3,496 · cited 4×
“The proposed stress-buffering model builds on the idea that social support can help individuals cope more successfully with stress-related pressures and burdens (e.g., Thoits, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialDoes entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00029-3 · Cited by 3,047
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 · Cited by 2,727
Cited by
Entrepreneurs’ Mental Health and Well-Being: A Review and Research Agenda
Stephan, U. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0001 · Cited by 759
How leaders' emotional displays shape followers' organizational citizenship behavior
Koning, L. F., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.001 · Cited by 127
Maruping, L. M., Daniel, S. L., & Cataldo, M. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13928 · Cited by 64
Self-efficacy in the face of threats to entrepreneurial success: mind-sets matter
Pollack, J. M., Burnette, J. L., & Hoyt, C. L. (2012) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.674452 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollack, J. M., Vanepps, E. M., & Hayes, A. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 789-810
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2106405008
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The moderating role of social ties on entrepreneurs' depressed affect and withdrawal intentions in response to economic stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.1794
- The paper
- Pollack, J. M., Vanepps, E. M., & Hayes, A. F. (2012). The moderating role of social ties on entrepreneurs' depressed affect and withdrawal intentions in response to economic stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.