The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes
Abstract
Summary: The purpose of this meta‐analysis was to use theory and research on diversity, attitudes, and training to examine potential differential effects on affective‐based, cognitive‐based, and skill‐based outcomes, to examine potential moderators of those effects with a focus on affective‐based outcomes, and finally, to provide quantitative estimates of these posited relationships. Results from 65 studies (N = 8465) revealed sizable effects on affective‐based, cognitive‐based, and skill‐based outcomes as well as interesting boundary conditions for these effects on affective‐based outcomes. This study provides practical value to human resources managers and trainers wishing to implement diversity training within organizations as well as interesting theoretical advances for researchers. Practitioners have quantitative evidence that diversity training changes affective‐based, cognitive‐based, and skill‐based trainee outcomes. This study also supports and addresses future research needs. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708 · cited 1×
“Research on prejudice reduction (see Paluck & Green, 2009, for a review) has suggested that social interdependence (Deutsch, 1949) and contact under optimal conditions (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006) can reduce prejudice.”
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.
van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 · Cited by 2,911
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,587
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105 · Cited by 2,502
The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1534 · Cited by 2,280
Cited by
Inclusive workplaces: A review and model
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2018) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.003 · Cited by 1,034
Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. F. (2016) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12119 · Cited by 614
A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000067 · Cited by 601
The mixed effects of online diversity training
Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D. M., Rebele, R. W., Massey, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Grant, A. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1816076116 · Cited by 304
A Multi-Level Process Model for Understanding Diversity Practice Effectiveness
Nishii, L. H., Khattab, J., Shemla, M., & Paluch, R. M. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0044 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele‐Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1076-1104
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2117471028
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.1839
- The paper
- Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele‐Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta‐analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
