The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consistency of implications of three role stressors across four countries
Abstract
Relationships between role stressors (ambiguity, overload, and conflict), anxiety, commitment (affective and continuance), and turnover intention were examined. These variables were measured via a survey of 1396 nurses in a total of 15 hospitals in Hungary, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Three role stressors were expected to predict anxiety and indirectly predict intention to leave. Anxiety was expected to predict affective and continuance commitment, and anxiety, affective commitment, and continuance commitment were expected to predict intention to leave the hospital. Although mean score differences were expected across countries, direction of the relationships between variables were expected to be the same, which would indicate consistency regarding the implications of three role stressors across countries. AMOS's structural equations modeling program was used to test a multi-group manifest variable path analysis. Results yielded support for the proposed relationships (NFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.89). It was tentatively concluded that stress is a culture-general process. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060
Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (2013) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.42 · Cited by 377
Stereotype threat among older employees: relationship with job attitudes and turnover intentions
von Hippel, C., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Henry, J. D. (2013) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0029825 · Cited by 182
Sklar, M., Ehrhart, M. G., & Aarons, G. A. (2021) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.1037/prj0000480 · Cited by 85
Hon, A. H. Y. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.06.003 · Cited by 86
Identifying the antecedents of work-role overload in police organizations
Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Halinski, M. (2015) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854814551017 · Cited by 59
Jian, G., & Dalisay, F. (2018) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488415594157 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Glazer, S., & Beehr, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-487
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2051659877
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
