The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role stressors, social support, and well‐being among two‐career couples
Abstract
The study examined relationships among work and family role stressors, work—family conflict, social support, and well‐being using data gathered from 119 men and 119 women who were partners in a two‐career relationship. Results showed that within‐domain relationships of stressors with well‐being are stronger than between‐domain relationships. Thus, work and family role stressors were primarily related to job satisfaction and family satisfaction respectively, whereas work and family role stressors as well as work—family conflict were associated with overall life stress. Similar results were found for the relationships of social support with well‐being. Work support was associated with increased job satisfaction, while spouse support was associated with greater family satisfaction. Some gender differences were found in the relationships of stressors and social support with well‐being. Implications of the findings for future research on work—family dynamics were discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social support, occupational stress, and health
LaRocco, J. M., House, J. S., & French, J. R. P. (1980) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136616 · Cited by 1,039
The role set: problems in sociological theory
Merton, R. K. (1957) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/587363 · Cited by 947 · cited 1×
“As marital partners constitute a social system, and represent important members of each other's role set (Merton, 1959), it has been suggested that the experiences of one role partner can influence the experiences and well-being of the other (Barnett and Baruch, 1987; Pearlin, 1985).”
BackgroundProcesses linking work and family: a critical review and research agenda
Lambert, S. J. (1990) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679004300303 · Cited by 592
Cited by
Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative analytical framework
Edwards, J. R. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810142004 · Cited by 1,128
Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review
Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D.-J. (2018) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9509-8 · Cited by 574
The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726705055967 · Cited by 481
Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007 · Cited by 367
For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states
Saxbe, D., & Repetti, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016959 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Parasuraman, S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Granrose, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-356
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2027483832
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role stressors, social support, and well‐being among two‐career couples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.4030130403
- The paper
- Parasuraman, S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Granrose, C. S. (1992). Role stressors, social support, and well‐being among two‐career couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
