Cited by 592Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Processes linking work and family: a critical review and research agenda

Lambert, Susan J.·1990·Human Relations

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the theoreticalframeworks currently used to explain the processes through which work and family are linked, i.e., segmentation, compensation, and spillover. In the literature, these processes are treated as competing explanations, even though evidence and logic suggests that all three operate to link work and family. Moreover, it is likely that other processes also link the two. Most notably, workers may limit their involvement in work, or in family life, so that they can better accommodate the demands of the other. Clarified causal models and suggestions for advancing knowledge in this area are presented and discussed. It is argued that a fuller understanding of the processes linking work and family life is necessary to adequately evaluate the effectiveness of the family supportive policies currently being implemented by many U.S. firms, as well as to identify additional strategies for helping workers find satisfaction in both their work and personal roles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872679004300303

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Susan J.
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1990-03
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
239-257
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2162558476
Cited by
592
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
FWCI
30.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
segmentation, compensation, spillover effects, work-family balance, causal models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review