Cited by 1,039Workplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout ResearchHealth and Well-being Studies

Social support, occupational stress, and health

LaRocco, James M., House, James S., French, John R. P.·1980·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

The present paper is concerned with the buffering hypothesis that social support ameliorate. the impact of occupational stress on job-related strain and health. Previous studies of this hypothesis have yielded conflicting results. Our purpose, therefore, is twofold. First, we summarize the literature in this area and review several studies in detail, all of which found main effects of social support on perceived occupational stress and on some health outcome measures. Three of the studies were specifically designed to examine the buffering effects of support. Of the three, two found little or no evidence for buffering (LaRocco and Jones, 1978a; Pinneau, 1975), whereas the third reported buffering effects (House and Wells, 1978). Second, we attempt to reconcile these different conclusions by reanalyzing one data set-first analyzed by Caplan et al. (1975) and then by Pinneau (1975)-using a moderated regression technique identical to that used in the LaRocco and Jones (1978a) and House and Wells (1978) studies. The data usedfor this analysis consist of a randomly stratified sample of men from 23 occupations (N 636). Our review andfindings support the buffering hypothesis for mental and physical health variables (anxiety, depression, irritation, and somatic symptoms), but, as in the previous three studies, fail to support the buffering hypothesis in regard to job-related strains (job dissatisfaction, boredom, dissatisfaction with work load).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2136616

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Daily stressors might be mitigated or reduced with supportive and inclusive organizational structures, policies, and practices.

    “The daily stressors might be mitigated or reduced with supportive and inclusive organizational structures, policies, and practices [22];”
  • There is similar evidence regarding organizational stress and burnout from other para-military structures, such as police, correctional, and paramedic services.

    “There is similar evidence regarding organizational stress and burnout from other para-military structures, such as police [20,22], correctional [28], and paramedic services [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaRocco, J. M., House, J. S., & French, J. R. P.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1980-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
202
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969156565
Cited by
1,039
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 41
FWCI
119.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, occupational stress, buffering hypothesis, job strain, job dissatisfaction, anxiety, depression, irritation, somatic symptoms, mental health, physical health
MeSH terms
Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review