The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional tissue engineering for tendon repair: A multidisciplinary strategy using mesenchymal stem cells, bioscaffolds, and mechanical stimulation
Abstract
Over the past 8 years, our group has been continuously improving tendon repair using a functional tissue engineering (FTE) paradigm. This paradigm was motivated by inconsistent clinical results after tendon repair and reconstruction, and the modest biomechanical improvements we observed after repair of rabbit central patellar tendon defects using mesenchymal stem cell‐gel‐suture constructs. Although possessing a significantly higher stiffness and failure force than for natural healing, these first generation constructs were quite weak compared to normal tendon. Fundamental to the new FTE paradigm was the need to determine in vivo forces to which the repair tissue might be exposed. We first recorded these force patterns in two normal tendon models and then compared these peak forces to those for repairs of central defects in the rabbit patellar tendon model (PT). Replacing the suture with end‐posts in culture and lowering the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) concentration of these constructs resulted in failure forces greater than peak in vivo forces that were measured for all the studied activities. Augmenting the gel with a type I collagen sponge further increased repair stiffness and maximum force, and resulted in the repair tangent stiffness matching normal stiffness up to peak in vivo forces. Mechanically stimulating these constructs in bioreactors further enhanced repair biomechanics compared to normal. We are now optimizing components of the mechanical signal that is delivered in culture to further improve construct and repair outcome. Our contributions in the area of tendon functional tissue engineering have the potential to create functional load‐bearing repairs that will revolutionize surgical reconstruction after tendon and ligament injury. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:1–9, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Engineered Microenvironments for Controlled Stem Cell Differentiation
Burdick, J. A., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0131 · Cited by 485
Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
Fan, H., Liu, H., Wong, E. J. W., Toh, S. L., & Goh, J. C. H. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.012 · Cited by 209
Biomimetic 3D tissue models for advanced high-throughput drug screening
Nam, K.-H., Smith, A. S. T., Lone, S., Kwon, S., & Kim, D.-H. (2015) · SLAS Technology · doi:10.1177/2211068214557813 · Cited by 171
Yin, Z., Chen, X., Zhu, T., Hu, J.-J., Song, H.-X., Shen, W.-L., Jiang, L.-Y., Heng, B. C., Ji, J.-F., & Ouyang, H.-W. (2013) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.022 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, D. L., Juncosa‐Melvin, N., Boivin, G. P., Galloway, M. T., Shearn, J. T., Gooch, C., & Awad, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2011935103
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional tissue engineering for tendon repair: A multidisciplinary strategy using mesenchymal stem cells, bioscaffolds, and mechanical stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20456
- The paper
- Butler, D. L., Juncosa‐Melvin, N., Boivin, G. P., Galloway, M. T., Shearn, J. T., Gooch, C., & Awad, H. (2008). Functional tissue engineering for tendon repair: A multidisciplinary strategy using mesenchymal stem cells, bioscaffolds, and mechanical stimulation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.