Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating cells with osteogenic potential are physiologically mobilized into the fracture healing site in the parabiotic mice model

Open access
Kumagai, Ken, Vasanji, Amit, Drazba, Judith A., Butler, Robert S., Muschler, George F.·2008·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Based on the accumulating evidence of osteogenic cells present in the systemic circulation, we hypothesized that circulating osteogenic connective tissue progenitors (CTPs) home to fracture site and contribute to skeletal repair. Parabiotic animals were formed by surgically conjoining transgenic mice constitutively expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in no erythroid tissue and syngeneic wild‐type mice. After 3 weeks parabionts, equilibrium in blood chimerism between partners was established. A transverse fibular fracture was made in the contralateral hind limb of the conjoined wild‐type partner. The contribution of circulating cells to the fracture callus was assessed based on analysis of GFP+ cells and co‐localization of alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining nonfracture and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after fracture. Histomorphometric analysis at the fracture site showed significant increase of GFP+ cells after 2 (5.4%) and 3 (5.6%) weeks compared to nonfractured controls (1.7%). Of the GFP+ cells, percentage of the cells expressing AP activity at 1 (37.4%) and 2 (85.3%) weeks postfracture time was statistically higher than that in nonfractured controls (10.8%). The rate of mobilization of circulating osteogenic CTPs to fracture callus was also examined using 1 week parabionts at week 0–1 and week 1–2 postfracture. There was significant increase of GFP+/AP+ cells from week 0–1 (0.1%) and week 1–2 (1.8%). These data indicate that circulating osteogenic CTPs are mobilized to fracture site and contribute to osteogenesis in the early stage of fracture healing. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:165–175, 2008

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20477

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Kumagai, K., Vasanji, A., Drazba, J. A., Butler, R. S., & Muschler, G. F.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-29
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
165-175
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2000779652
Cited by
177
References
3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating cells with osteogenic potential are physiologically mobilized into the fracture healing site in the parabiotic mice model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20477
The paper
Kumagai, K., Vasanji, A., Drazba, J. A., Butler, R. S., & Muschler, G. F. (2008). Circulating cells with osteogenic potential are physiologically mobilized into the fracture healing site in the parabiotic mice model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20477

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.