Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective laser melting‐produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects

Open access
Van der Stok, Johan, Van der Jagt, Olav P., Amin Yavari, Saber, De Haas, Mirthe F. P., Waarsing, Jan H., Jahr, Holger, Van Lieshout, Esther M. M., Patka, Peter, Verhaar, Jan A. N., Zadpoor, Amir A., Weinans, Harrie·2013·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Porous titanium scaffolds have good mechanical properties that make them an interesting bone substitute material for large bone defects. These scaffolds can be produced with selective laser melting, which has the advantage of tailoring the structure's architecture. Reducing the strut size reduces the stiffness of the structure and may have a positive effect on bone formation. Two scaffolds with struts of 120‐µm (titanium‐120) or 230‐µm (titanium‐230) were studied in a load‐bearing critical femoral bone defect in rats. The defect was stabilized with an internal plate and treated with titanium‐120, titanium‐230, or left empty. In vivo micro‐CT scans at 4, 8, and 12 weeks showed more bone in the defects treated with scaffolds. Finally, 18.4 ± 7.1 mm 3 (titanium‐120, p = 0.015) and 18.7 ± 8.0 mm 3 (titanium‐230, p = 0.012) of bone was formed in those defects, significantly more than in the empty defects (5.8 ± 5.1 mm 3). Bending tests on the excised femurs after 12 weeks showed that the fusion strength reached 62% (titanium‐120) and 45% (titanium‐230) of the intact contralateral femurs, but there was no significant difference between the two scaffolds. This study showed that in addition to adequate mechanical support, porous titanium scaffolds facilitate bone formation, which results in high mechanical integrity of the treated large bone defects. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 792–799, 2013

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.22293

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Van der Stok, J., Van der Jagt, O. P., Amin Yavari, S., De Haas, M. F. P., Waarsing, J. H., Jahr, H., Van Lieshout, E. M. M., Patka, P., Verhaar, J. A. N., Zadpoor, A. A., & Weinans, H.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-19
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
792-799
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W1968384518
Cited by
271
References
23
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective laser melting‐produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.22293
The paper
Van der Stok, J., Van der Jagt, O. P., Amin Yavari, S., De Haas, M. F. P., Waarsing, J. H., Jahr, H., Van Lieshout, E. M. M., Patka, P., Verhaar, J. A. N., Zadpoor, A. A., & Weinans, H. (2013). Selective laser melting‐produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.