Cited by 13Geological and Geophysical StudiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Volcanic ash and tsunami record of the Minoan Late Bronze Age Eruption (Santorini) in a distal setting, southwestern Turkey

Aydar, Erkan, ÇİNer, Attila, Ersoy, Orkun, ÉCochard, Emilie, Fouache, Eric G.·2021·Journal of Quaternary Science

Abstract

We present the volcanic ash and tsunami record of the Minoan Late Bronze Age Eruption of Santorini (LBAES) in a distal setting in southwestern Turkey. In one of the drilled cores at the Letoon Hellenic antique site on Eşençay Delta, we encountered a 4 cm thick tephra deposit underlain by 46 cm thick tsunami‐deposited sand (tsunamite), and an organic‐rich layer that we 14 C dated to 3295 ± 30 bp or 1633 bc. The relationship between Santorini distal volcanic ash and underlying tsunamite is described and interpreted. LBAES occurred in four main phases: (1) plinian; (2) phreatomagmatic; (3) phreatomagmatic with mudflows; and (4) ignimbritic flows and co‐ignimbrite tephra falls. In this study, we aim to understand which eruptive phases generate distal ash during the Minoan eruptive sequence by examining the 3D surface morphology of ash formed by different fragmentation processes. To that end, we used numerous statistical multivariates, 3D fractal dimension of roughness, and a new textural parameter of surface area‐3D/plotted area‐2D to characterise the eruption dynamics. Based on ash surface morphologies and the calculated statistical parameters, we propose that that distal ash is represented by a single layer composed of well‐mixed (coarse to fine) magmatic and phreatomagmatic ash.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jqs.3314

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aydar, E., ÇİNer, A., Ersoy, O., ÉCochard, E., & Fouache, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Istanbul Technical University (TR)
  • Department of Geography Paris Sorbonne IV University Paris France
Corresponding author
Aydar, Erkan
Venue
Journal of Quaternary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-26
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
586-597
ISSN
  • 0267-8179 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1417
OpenAlex
W3158841748
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Quaternary Science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Istanbul Technical University Academic Open Archive (Istanbul Technical University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Keywords
Santorini eruption, volcanic ash, tsunami deposits, fractal roughness, eruption phases, phreatomagmatic eruptions, southwestern Turkey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review