Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the oldest Middle Palaeolithic cave occupation in the Romanian Carpathians

Schmidt, Christoph, Veres, Daniel, Murătoreanu, George, Cosac, Marian, Niţă, Loredana, Vasile, Ştefan, Şerbănescu, Gabriel Sebastian, Bartok, Iuliana‐Elisabeta·2025·Journal of Quaternary Science

Abstract

The Middle and Upper Palaeolithic sites in the Carpathians and Danube lowlands constitute key contexts for tracing the dispersal of Homo sapiens into central‐western Europe and the replacement of Homo neanderthalensis. Surprisingly, the Romanian archaeological inventory lacks transitional technologies and only a few sites have been systematically excavated and numerically dated, explaining the incomplete understanding of the Middle Palaeolithic and hence Neanderthal population dynamics. Here we present new age constraints for the Abri 122/1200 and Peștera Mare caves in the Romanian Carpathians, obtained by radiocarbon dating of charcoal and bone and by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of cave sediments. Methodological issues and the method's upper limit cause grossly underestimated radiocarbon ages for charcoal from Abri 122/1200 and provide only minimum ages (>41–60 14 C ka bp) for bones from Peștera Mare cave. However, the OSL ages suggest Middle Palaeolithic cave occupation in the Carpathians since early Marine Isotopic Stage (MIS) 7 and lasting at least until MIS 5. These ages reinforce the vast potential of Carpathian cave sites in solidifying our understanding of Neanderthal dynamics in the region and their habitats. We discuss the reliability of this new chronology and the archaeological implications for the Middle Palaeolithic of neighbouring areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jqs.3667

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain caves were used in distinct but recurrent episodes, indicating a sustainable and directed exploitation of the same landscape structures.

    “These studies confirm that certain caves were used in distinct but recurrent episodes, which indicates a sustainable and directed exploitation of the same landscape structures.”

    From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Integrated chronostratigraphy for Abri 122/1200 section describes occupation spanning multiple periods, ‘though not necessarily continuously,’ which supports episodic use of that site. The Conclusions discuss age estimates for two cave sites but do not establish recurrent use of multiple caves or conclude that their use was sustainable and directed exploitation of the landscape. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The recently researched sites in Vârghiș Gorges indicate a MIS 3 - MIS 4 chronology.

    “The recently researched sites in Vârghiș Gorges indicate a MIS 3 – MIS 4 chronology [28].”

    From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Contextualization section describes the Vârghiș karst sites as spanning MIS 7–3, which includes MIS 3–4 but extends substantially earlier. The Integrated chronostratigraphy section likewise dates Abri 122/1200 from MIS 7 probably to MIS 3. The claim therefore gives an unduly narrow chronology for the sites. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There was no documentation of Middle Palaeolithic in the Eastern Carpathians prior to the authors' research, and all caves with Middle Palaeolithic presences in the Eastern Carpathians were included in the specialized literature by the authors' team.

    “It is important to add that there was no documentation of MP in the Eastern Carpathians prior to our researches. All caves with MP presences in the Eastern Carpathians were included in the specialized literature by the team led by the authors of this article [1,2,26,28].”

    From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although the analyzed sites belong to the same technological and cultural framework, their occupations are not considered contemporaneous in the strict sense.

    “Although they all belong to the same technological and cultural framework, the occupations are not considered contemporaneous in the strict sense.”
  • Recent studies in the region demonstrate the existence of successive habitation events in similar paleogeographic contexts.

    “Recent studies conducted in the region [1,2,28] have made significant contributions to the understanding of the chronology of the MP sites, demonstrating the existence of successive habitation events, in similar paleogeographic contexts.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 102

  1. Aitken M., 1985, Thermoluminescence dating
  2. 10.1017/S0033822200064638 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.06.044 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.01.012 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.08.002 · DOI
  6. Balescu S., 2015, Mamaia Sat (Romania): A Late Middle Pleistocene Palaeolithic Site?, Anthropologie, 53, 157
  7. 10.1016/j.anthro.2018.02.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003972 · DOI
  9. Berger G.W., 1980, Isolation of silt‐sized quartz from sediments, Ancient TL, 11, 8
  10. 10.1130/G36514.1 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90119-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00039-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.09.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108546 · DOI
  15. Chu W., 2019, Geoarchaeology and geochronology of the Upper Palaeolithic site of Temerești Dealu Vinii, Banat, Romania: Site formation processes and human activity of an open‐air locality, Quartär, 66, 111
  16. Chu W., 2016, The Early Upper Paleolithic of the Banat and recent research at the Paleolithic site of Tincova, Banatica, 26, 51
  17. 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.07.052 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cosac M., 2021, Recent archaeological researches within the Vârghiș Gorges karst area (Eastern Carpathians, Romania), A synthesis of the 2014‐2020 campaigns, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, supplementum, 1, 325
  20. 10.5194/egqsj-67-41-2019 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216742 · DOI
  22. 10.23898/litikuma0013 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.09.003 · DOI
  24. Doboș A., 2017, The Middle Palaeolithic research in Romania: Past and current issues, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, 13, 5
  25. Doboș A., 2019, Between the woods and the water: The early Upper Paleolithic from the Romanian karst, Analele Banatului, 27, 17
  26. Doboș A., 2012, A new AMS radiocarbon date for Middle Paleolithic layer 4 of Ripiceni‐Izvor, Romania, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, 8, 7
  27. 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.01.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00170-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00051.x · DOI
  30. Duller G.A.T., 2015, The Analyst software package for luminescence data: overview and recent improvements, Ancient TL, 33, 35
  31. 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.03.012 · DOI
  32. 10.1088/0957-0233/14/9/302 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065839 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41586-024-07151-3 · DOI
  35. Guérin G., 2011, Dose‐rate conversion factors: update, Ancient TL, 29, 5
  36. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.04.004 · DOI
  37. 10.1017/S0033822200039059 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41586-021-03335-3 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107645 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0003598X00067570 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.009 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.018 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.002 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.04.063 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.030 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.01.004 · DOI
  48. Kreutzer S., 2012, Introducing an R package for luminescence dating analysis, Ancient TL, 30, 1
  49. 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.08.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.07.010 · DOI
  51. 10.1017/RDC.2018.41 · DOI
  52. 10.1017/RDC.2019.60 · DOI
  53. Mauz B., 2006, The alpha effectiveness in silt‐sized quartz: new data obtained by single and multiple aliquot protocols, Ancient TL, 24, 47
  54. 10.1038/nature04521 · DOI
  55. 10.1086/204513 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103138 · DOI
  57. 10.1017/S0033822200057829 · DOI
  58. 10.1017/S0033822200057453 · DOI
  59. Murray A.S., 2002, Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz: a status review, Geochronometria, 21, 1
  60. 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X · DOI
  61. 10.1038/s41586-023-06923-7 · DOI
  62. Nejman L., 2008, A re‐interpretation of Early Upper Palaeolithic assemblages from Stránská Skála: the differences in lithic economy between the Aurignacian and the Bohunician assemblages, Přehled výzkumů, 49, 23
  63. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108600 · DOI
  64. Orghidan N., 1963, Studiu monografic al complexului carstic din defileul Vârghişului, Lucrarile Institutului de Speologie “Emil Racoviță”, 1, 69
  65. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108596 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107827 · DOI
  67. Pop C.M., 2013, The Middle Palaeolithic of present day Romania: A critical review
  68. 10.1017/S0033822200033592 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1002/gea.20180 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/j.jas.2018.09.012 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101020 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.04.003 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00062-3 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.02.023 · DOI
  76. Sirakova S.(2009)Middle Palaeolithic leaf points from Bulgaria. In:Gatsov I.(Ed.)Saxa Loquuntur Avalon Sofia 119–139.
  77. Sitlivy V., 2012, The earliest Aurignacian in Romania: New investigations at the open air site of Româneşti‐Dumbrăviţa I (Banat): Das früheste Aurignacien in Rumänien–Neue Untersuchungen an der Freilandfundstelle Româneşti‐Dumbrăviţa I (Banat), Quartär, 59, 85
  78. 10.1086/519915 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.1808647115 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.05.015 · DOI
  81. Stepanchuk V., 2010, Middle and Upper Pleistocene of Ukraine: Synopsis of Palaeolithic finds with special reference to patterns of peopling and cultural development, Arheologia Moldovei, 33, 13
  82. 10.1017/S0033822200013904 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.12.003 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.aeae.2014.03.002 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/s43247-023-00929-9 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.002 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.06.023 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.01.009 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.08.001 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106331 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.quageo.2014.12.005 · DOI
  92. 10.1073/pnas.2035108100 · DOI
  93. Tuffreau A. Chirica V. Bălescu S.&Haesaerts P.(2009) Nouvelles recherches sur le gisement paléolithique de Mitoc Valea Izvorului (dép. de Botoșani). Fouilles 2003–2004.Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice5 21‐31. · DOI
  94. 10.1038/nature05214 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/j.quageo.2016.05.005 · DOI
  96. 10.1371/journal.pone.0225117 · DOI
  97. 10.1007/978-3-319-90747-5_8 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.07.015 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.09.037 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.027 · DOI
  101. 10.1073/pnas.0605128103 · DOI
  102. Zöller L., 1989, A note on overcounting in alpha‐counters and its elimination, Ancient TL, 7, 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, C., Veres, D., Murătoreanu, G., Cosac, M., Niţă, L., Vasile, Ş., Şerbănescu, G. S., & Bartok, I.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
  • Romanian Academy, Institute of Speleology Cluj‐Napoca Romania
  • “Valahia” University of Târgovişte Târgovişte Romania
  • Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Lythos Research Center, University of Bucharest Bucharest Romania
  • National Museum of Eastern Carpathians Sfântu Gheorghe Romania
Venue
Journal of Quaternary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-11-14
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
22-35
ISSN
  • 0267-8179
  • 1099-1417
Cited by
3
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • EEA Grants
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review