The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for the oldest Middle Palaeolithic cave occupation in the Romanian Carpathians
Abstract
The Middle and Upper Palaeolithic sites in the Carpathians and Danube lowlands constitute key contexts for tracing the dispersal of Homo sapiens into central‐western Europe and the replacement of Homo neanderthalensis. Surprisingly, the Romanian archaeological inventory lacks transitional technologies and only a few sites have been systematically excavated and numerically dated, explaining the incomplete understanding of the Middle Palaeolithic and hence Neanderthal population dynamics. Here we present new age constraints for the Abri 122/1200 and Peștera Mare caves in the Romanian Carpathians, obtained by radiocarbon dating of charcoal and bone and by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of cave sediments. Methodological issues and the method's upper limit cause grossly underestimated radiocarbon ages for charcoal from Abri 122/1200 and provide only minimum ages (>41–60 14 C ka bp) for bones from Peștera Mare cave. However, the OSL ages suggest Middle Palaeolithic cave occupation in the Carpathians since early Marine Isotopic Stage (MIS) 7 and lasting at least until MIS 5. These ages reinforce the vast potential of Carpathian cave sites in solidifying our understanding of Neanderthal dynamics in the region and their habitats. We discuss the reliability of this new chronology and the archaeological implications for the Middle Palaeolithic of neighbouring areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain caves were used in distinct but recurrent episodes, indicating a sustainable and directed exploitation of the same landscape structures.
“These studies confirm that certain caves were used in distinct but recurrent episodes, which indicates a sustainable and directed exploitation of the same landscape structures.”
From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The Integrated chronostratigraphy for Abri 122/1200 section describes occupation spanning multiple periods, ‘though not necessarily continuously,’ which supports episodic use of that site. The Conclusions discuss age estimates for two cave sites but do not establish recurrent use of multiple caves or conclude that their use was sustainable and directed exploitation of the landscape. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe recently researched sites in Vârghiș Gorges indicate a MIS 3 - MIS 4 chronology.
“The recently researched sites in Vârghiș Gorges indicate a MIS 3 – MIS 4 chronology [28].”
From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The Contextualization section describes the Vârghiș karst sites as spanning MIS 7–3, which includes MIS 3–4 but extends substantially earlier. The Integrated chronostratigraphy section likewise dates Abri 122/1200 from MIS 7 probably to MIS 3. The claim therefore gives an unduly narrow chronology for the sites. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere was no documentation of Middle Palaeolithic in the Eastern Carpathians prior to the authors' research, and all caves with Middle Palaeolithic presences in the Eastern Carpathians were included in the specialized literature by the authors' team.
“It is important to add that there was no documentation of MP in the Eastern Carpathians prior to our researches. All caves with MP presences in the Eastern Carpathians were included in the specialized literature by the team led by the authors of this article [1,2,26,28].”
From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAlthough the analyzed sites belong to the same technological and cultural framework, their occupations are not considered contemporaneous in the strict sense.
“Although they all belong to the same technological and cultural framework, the occupations are not considered contemporaneous in the strict sense.”
From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Recent studies in the region demonstrate the existence of successive habitation events in similar paleogeographic contexts.
“Recent studies conducted in the region [1,2,28] have made significant contributions to the understanding of the chronology of the MP sites, demonstrating the existence of successive habitation events, in similar paleogeographic contexts.”
From Tracing neanderthal mobility through the romanian carpathians: a GIS-based least-cost connectivity model (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor
Fu, Q., Hajdinjak, M., Moldovan, O. T., Constantin, S., Mallick, S., Skoglund, P., Patterson, N., Rohland, N., Lazaridis, I., Nickel, B., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14558 · Cited by 802
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 102
- Aitken M., 1985, Thermoluminescence dating
- 10.1017/S0033822200064638 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.06.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.01.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.08.002 · DOI
- Balescu S., 2015, Mamaia Sat (Romania): A Late Middle Pleistocene Palaeolithic Site?, Anthropologie, 53, 157
- 10.1016/j.anthro.2018.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0003972 · DOI
- Berger G.W., 1980, Isolation of silt‐sized quartz from sediments, Ancient TL, 11, 8
- 10.1130/G36514.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90119-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00039-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108546 · DOI
- Chu W., 2019, Geoarchaeology and geochronology of the Upper Palaeolithic site of Temerești Dealu Vinii, Banat, Romania: Site formation processes and human activity of an open‐air locality, Quartär, 66, 111
- Chu W., 2016, The Early Upper Paleolithic of the Banat and recent research at the Paleolithic site of Tincova, Banatica, 26, 51
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.07.052 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Cosac M., 2021, Recent archaeological researches within the Vârghiș Gorges karst area (Eastern Carpathians, Romania), A synthesis of the 2014‐2020 campaigns, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, supplementum, 1, 325
- 10.5194/egqsj-67-41-2019 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0216742 · DOI
- 10.23898/litikuma0013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.09.003 · DOI
- Doboș A., 2017, The Middle Palaeolithic research in Romania: Past and current issues, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, 13, 5
- Doboș A., 2019, Between the woods and the water: The early Upper Paleolithic from the Romanian karst, Analele Banatului, 27, 17
- Doboș A., 2012, A new AMS radiocarbon date for Middle Paleolithic layer 4 of Ripiceni‐Izvor, Romania, Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice, 8, 7
- 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00170-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00051.x · DOI
- Duller G.A.T., 2015, The Analyst software package for luminescence data: overview and recent improvements, Ancient TL, 33, 35
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-0233/14/9/302 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0065839 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07151-3 · DOI
- Guérin G., 2011, Dose‐rate conversion factors: update, Ancient TL, 29, 5
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033822200039059 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03335-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107645 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00067570 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.04.063 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.01.004 · DOI
- Kreutzer S., 2012, Introducing an R package for luminescence dating analysis, Ancient TL, 30, 1
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1017/RDC.2018.41 · DOI
- 10.1017/RDC.2019.60 · DOI
- Mauz B., 2006, The alpha effectiveness in silt‐sized quartz: new data obtained by single and multiple aliquot protocols, Ancient TL, 24, 47
- 10.1038/nature04521 · DOI
- 10.1086/204513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103138 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033822200057829 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033822200057453 · DOI
- Murray A.S., 2002, Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz: a status review, Geochronometria, 21, 1
- 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06923-7 · DOI
- Nejman L., 2008, A re‐interpretation of Early Upper Palaeolithic assemblages from Stránská Skála: the differences in lithic economy between the Aurignacian and the Bohunician assemblages, Přehled výzkumů, 49, 23
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108600 · DOI
- Orghidan N., 1963, Studiu monografic al complexului carstic din defileul Vârghişului, Lucrarile Institutului de Speologie “Emil Racoviță”, 1, 69
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108596 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107827 · DOI
- Pop C.M., 2013, The Middle Palaeolithic of present day Romania: A critical review
- 10.1017/S0033822200033592 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/gea.20180 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jas.2018.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00062-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.02.023 · DOI
- Sirakova S.(2009)Middle Palaeolithic leaf points from Bulgaria. In:Gatsov I.(Ed.)Saxa Loquuntur Avalon Sofia 119–139.
- Sitlivy V., 2012, The earliest Aurignacian in Romania: New investigations at the open air site of Româneşti‐Dumbrăviţa I (Banat): Das früheste Aurignacien in Rumänien–Neue Untersuchungen an der Freilandfundstelle Româneşti‐Dumbrăviţa I (Banat), Quartär, 59, 85
- 10.1086/519915 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1808647115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.05.015 · DOI
- Stepanchuk V., 2010, Middle and Upper Pleistocene of Ukraine: Synopsis of Palaeolithic finds with special reference to patterns of peopling and cultural development, Arheologia Moldovei, 33, 13
- 10.1017/S0033822200013904 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aeae.2014.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43247-023-00929-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.06.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106331 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2014.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2035108100 · DOI
- Tuffreau A. Chirica V. Bălescu S.&Haesaerts P.(2009) Nouvelles recherches sur le gisement paléolithique de Mitoc Valea Izvorului (dép. de Botoșani). Fouilles 2003–2004.Materiale și Cercetări Arheologice5 21‐31. · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05214 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2016.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0225117 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-90747-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.07.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.09.037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.027 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0605128103 · DOI
- Zöller L., 1989, A note on overcounting in alpha‐counters and its elimination, Ancient TL, 7, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murătoreanu, G., & Cosac, M. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334149 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, C., Veres, D., Murătoreanu, G., Cosac, M., Niţă, L., Vasile, Ş., Şerbănescu, G. S., & Bartok, I.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
- Romanian Academy, Institute of Speleology Cluj‐Napoca Romania
- “Valahia” University of Târgovişte Târgovişte Romania
- Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Lythos Research Center, University of Bucharest Bucharest Romania
- National Museum of Eastern Carpathians Sfântu Gheorghe Romania
- Venue
- Journal of Quaternary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-11-14
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-35
- ISSN
- 0267-8179
- 1099-1417
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- EEA Grants
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review