Cited by 365Digital Innovation in IndustriesCorporate Management and LeadershipInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned from traditional organizations

Open access
Loonam, John, Eaves, Sally, Kumar, Vikas, Parry, Glenn·2018·Strategic Change

Abstract

Digitally enabled organizations are supported by new information and communication technologies, referred to as digital technologies, which increasingly promise enormous opportunities for growth. The study reviews 10 case studies from the literature and analysis the approaches these organizations have taken to successfully implement digital technologies. The findings reveal a conceptual framework that seeks to support management in understanding the actions required to implement digital transformation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsc.2185

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such an increase in value required significant time costs and extremely large capital investments, which limited the amount of money and valuable talent available.

    “However, such an increase in value required significant time costs and extremely large capital investments, which limited the amount of money and valuable talent available.”
  • Expansion in scale increased the enterprise's global influence, provided more opportunities to capture markets, and ultimately made enterprises profitable.

    “The expansion in scale increased the enterprise's global influence, provided more opportunities to capture markets, and ultimately made the enterprises profitable [3].”
  • In traditional organizations, value creation heavily depended on the total cost of ownership, resources, equipment, and personnel costs: the more owned, the more value created.

    “In the era of traditional organizations, value creation heavily depended on the total cost of ownership, resources, equipment, and personnel costs: the more you owned, the more value you created.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loonam, J., Eaves, S., Kumar, V., & Parry, G.
Affiliations
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Faculty of Business & Law, University of the West of England London, United Kingdom
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Loonam, John
Venue
Strategic Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
101-109
ISSN
  • 1086-1718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1697
OpenAlex
W2751640384
Cited by
365
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
28.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Strategic Change (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
digital transformation, digital technologies, organizational change, technology implementation, lessons learned, conceptual framework, information and communication technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review