Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mouth‐feel properties of grape and apple proanthocyanidins in a wine‐like medium

Vidal, Stéphane, Francis, Leigh, Guyot, Sylvain, Marnet, Nathalie, Kwiatkowski, Mariola, Gawel, Richard, Cheynier, Véronique, Waters, Elizabeth J·2003·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

A range of structurally defined apple and grape proanthocyanidins was isolated in sufficient amount to carry out a formal sensory descriptive analysis study. Purified proanthocyanidin fractions differed in chain length, degree of galloylation and epigallocatechin content. Astringency attributes of the preparations in a model wine medium were rated while the fractions were held in the mouth and after expectoration. The degree of polymerization appeared to be the variable that discriminated among the fractions to the greatest extent. It affected both the overall astringency and the different individual astringency attributes, with increased ‘drying’, ‘chalky’, ‘adhesive’ and ‘pucker’ characters correlating with increasing chain length. A rougher sensation with increased ‘coarseness’, ‘drying’ and ‘chalkiness’ correlated with an increased degree of galloylation of the fractions. The presence of epigallocatechin units in the proanthocyanidin tended to lower the ‘coarse’ perception. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.1394

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Vidal, S., Francis, L., Guyot, S., Marnet, N., Kwiatkowski, M., Gawel, R., Cheynier, V., & Waters, E. J.
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-27
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
564-573
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2050981629
Cited by
508
References
23
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.