Cited by 94Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Influence of coffee/water ratio on the final quality of espresso coffee

Open access
Andueza, Susana, Vila, María A, Paz de Peña, M, Cid, Concepción·2007·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Espresso coffee is a polyphasic beverage in which the physico‐chemical and sensory characteristics obviously depend on both the selection of ground roasted coffee and the technical conditions of the percolation process. The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of the coffee/water ratio on the physico‐chemical and sensory quality of espresso coffee. Furthermore, the influence of botanical varieties (Arabica and Robusta) and the type of roast (conventional and torrefacto) on the selection of coffee/water ratio was studied. The relationship between pH and the perception of acidity intensity is discussed in relation to the influence of the coffee/water ratio, type of coffee and roast. The optimisation of other technical parameters in previous studies seemed to minimise the influence of an increase in the coffee/water ratio on the extraction of soluble and solid compounds. In fact, only some sensory attributes, such as bitterness, astringency and burnt, acrid and earthy/musty flavours were proposed as relevant to the selection of 6.5 g 40 mL−1 or 7.5 g 40 mL−1 in conventional roasted coffees (Arabica 100% and Robusta blend), and 6.5 g 40 mL−1 in torrefacto roasted coffees. On the other hand, the addition of sugar during the roasting process in torrefacto roast coffees seemed to contribute to a higher generation of acids, melanoidins and other compounds by the Maillard reaction or caramelisation, which led us to select the lowest coffee/water ratio. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2720

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andueza, S., Vila, M. A., Paz de Peña, M., & Cid, C.
Affiliations
Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Corresponding author
Cid, Concepción
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-15
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
586-592
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2137274932
Cited by
94
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
espresso, Coffea arabica, Robusta, sensory quality, bitterness, astringency, acidity, pH, Maillard reaction, melanoidins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review