Cited by 22Coffee research and impactsAgricultural and Biological ResearchMicroencapsulation and Drying Processes

Modeling study of coffee extraction at different temperature and grind size conditions to better understand the cold and hot brewing process

Wang, Xiuju, Lim, Loong‐Tak·2021·Journal of Food Process Engineering

Abstract

In this study, the extraction kinetics, based on total dissolved solid (TDS), at different temperatures (4, 23, 50, and 93°C) for different grind sizes (VMD = 139, 643, 1,450, 1,747 μm) were investigated. Coffee extraction proceeded in initial fast extraction stage followed by a significantly slower extraction stage, which correspond to the extraction from surfaces of broken cells and the extraction from intact coffee cells, respectively. Diffusion inside the coffee particle is a very slow process, so breaking the cells is a very efficient way to increase the mass transfer rate. In addition, the ultimate extraction yield increased with increasing brewing temperature and decreasing of particle size. The Weibull distribution, pseudo‐first order and pseudo‐second order model were fitted to the kinetics data, with high coefficients of determination (0.687–0.998), and low root mean square error (0.02–0.26%). Meanwhile, exponential equations were created to correlate the derived rate constants (1/α, k1, and k2) with brewing temperature and particle size to achieve the prediction of brewing extent (TDS t/TDS eqm) at different temperature‐particle size combinations. Practical applications: This study investigated the kinetics of coffee extraction at different grind size and temperature conditions with the purposes to better understanding the cold and hot coffee brewing process, as well as to predict the coffee extraction. The findings in this study will have practical applications in three folds: Help manufacturers of coffee brew products (ready to drink or concentrate) to better design and control their coffee extraction process. Aid manufacturers of coffee extraction equipment and coffee brewers to improve their products Provide reference information for coffee store, barista, coffee enthusiast, and consumers to brewing a better cup of coffee

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpe.13748

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., & Lim, L.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiuju
Venue
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-15
Volume
44
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0145-8876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4530
OpenAlex
W3161600892
Cited by
22
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Process Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Ontario Centres of Excellence
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
Keywords
coffee extraction, extraction kinetics, brewing temperature, grind size, total dissolved solids, mass transfer, Weibull distribution, pseudo-first-order kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, cold brew, extraction yield prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review