Cited by 38Organic Food and AgricultureFood and Agricultural SciencesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The influence of organic production on food quality – research findings, gaps and future challenges

Open access
Załęcka, Aneta, Bügel, Susanne, Paoletti, Flavio, Kahl, Johannes, Bonanno, Adriana, Dostalova, Anne, Rahmann, Gerold·2014·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Although several meta‐analysis studies have been published comparing the quality of food derived from organic and non‐organic origin, it is still not clear if food from organic production per se can guarantee product‐related added value to consumers. This paper aims to summarize the status quo in order to identify research gaps and suggest future research challenges. Organic food is described according to a quality model already published. The influence of organic production on food quality is structured in primary production and processing. Furthermore, organic food authentication is discussed. Organic food seems to contain fewer pesticide residues and statistically more selected health‐related compounds such as polyphenols in plant products and polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk and meat products, but the health relevance for consumers is not clear yet. Comparing food from organic origin with so called ‘conventional’ food seems not to be appropriate, because ‘conventional’ is not defined. In organic food quality research a system approach is needed from which systemic markers can be selected. Research on the impact of processing technologies on the quality according to organic principles seems of high relevance, since most of the food is processed. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.6578

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beck A, Kretzschmar U and Schmid O. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick (Switzerland), pp. 40-43 (2006).
  2. Schmid O and Beck A, Development of organic agriculture and food processing, in Organic Food Processing -Principles, Concepts and Rec- ommendations for the Future. Results of a European Research Project on the Quality of Low Input Foods. FiBL-Report, ed. by Beck A, Kret- zschmar U and Schmid O. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick (Switzerland), pp. 17-22 (2006).
  3. Codex Alimentarius, Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods (GL 32-1999) (adopted 1999, revisions 2001, 2003, 2004 and 2007, amendments 2008, 2009 and 2010). Codex Alimentarius, Rome (2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Załęcka, A., Bügel, S., Paoletti, F., Kahl, J., Bonanno, A., Dostalova, A., & Rahmann, G.
Affiliations
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione (IT)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Institute of Animal Science Prague Czech Republic
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Załęcka, Aneta
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-03
Volume
94
Issue
13
Pages
2600-2604
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W1498616018
Cited by
38
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
organic food, food quality, organic production, pesticide residues, polyphenols, polyunsaturated fatty acids, organic food authentication, food processing, quality model, consumer health, research gaps
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Consumer Advocacy, Food Analysis, Food Handling, Food Inspection, Humans, Models, Biological, Biomarkers, Food, Organic, Organic Agriculture, Food Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review