The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrophoretic methods for separation of nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews progress in the application of electrophoretic techniques for the separation of nanoparticles. Numerous types of nanoparticles have recently been synthesised and integrated into different products and procedures. Consequently, analytical methods for the efficient characterisation of nanoparticles are now required. Several studies have revealed that gel electrophoresis can readily be used for separating nanoparticles according to their size or shape. However, many other studies focused on separation of nanoparticles by CE. In some cases nanoparticles could be separated by CZE, simply using pure buffer as the BGE. In other studies, buffer additives (most often SDS) were used, enabling fast separations of metallic nanoparticles by size. Other CE methods also allowed for separation of nanoparticle conjugates with biomolecules. Dielectrophoresis is yet another electrophoretic technique useful in separation and characterisation of nanoparticles; particularly nanotubes. Detection methods often used after electrophoretic separation include UV/Vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Examples of recent and relevant older reports are presented here. The authors conclude that electrophoretic methods for nanoanalysis can provide inexpensive and efficient tools for quality assurance and safety control; and as a consequence, they can augment transfer of nanotechnologies from research to industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles
Gao, L., Zhuang, J., Nie, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Gu, N., Wang, T., Feng, J., Yang, D., Perrett, S., et al. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.260 · Cited by 7,483
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Direct imaging of single-walled carbon nanotubes in cells
Porter, A. E., Gass, M., Muller, K., Skepper, J. N., Midgley, P. A., & Welland, M. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.347 · Cited by 564
Cited by
Sapsford, K. E., Tyner, K. M., Dair, B. J., Deschamps, J. R., & Medintz, I. L. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac200853a · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Surugau, N., & Urban, P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Separation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1889-1906
- ISSN
- 1615-9306 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9314
- OpenAlex
- W2111313217
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophoretic methods for separation of nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jssc.200900071
- The paper
- Surugau, N., & Urban, P. L. (2009). Electrophoretic methods for separation of nanoparticles. Journal of Separation Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.