Cited by 139Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationERP Systems Implementation and Impact

Modelling roles of task‐technology fit and self‐efficacy in hotel employees' usage behaviours of hotel information systems

Kim, Taegoo (Terry), Suh, Yong Kun, Lee, Gyehee, Choi, Byong Gil·2010·International Journal of Tourism Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hotel information system (HIS) users' personal perceptions and beliefs of the given system and their daily routine usage intention via the technology acceptance model (TAM), considering the two external variables (motivational variables) of the model — ‘task‐technology fit’ (extrinsic motivation; system feature) and ‘self‐efficacy’ (intrinsic motivation; personal feature). Data were collected from hotel employees of 13 upscale hotels in Jeju, South Korea, and path analysis was utilised to test structural model and hypotheses. The results provided empirical support for an extended TAM, and verified its robustness in predicting hotel employees' intention to use a HIS. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jtr.787

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of empirical studies have advocated the use of attitude as a mediating variable along with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the TAM model.

    “A number of empirical studies (e.g., Aboelmaged 2010; Aggelidis and Chatzoglou 2009; Kim et al. 2010) have advocated the use of attitude as a mediating variable along with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the TAM model.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, T. (., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Jeju National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Taegoo (Terry)
Venue
International Journal of Tourism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
709-725
ISSN
  • 1099-2340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1970
OpenAlex
W2019760021
Cited by
139
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Tourism Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kyung Hee University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Keywords
task-technology fit, self-efficacy, hotel information systems, technology acceptance model, intention to use, hotel employees, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, extended TAM, information systems adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review