Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A positive task-technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) extension.
“Research Proposition 2 (a-d): A positive task -technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) (a)initiation, (b)adoption, (c)routinization, and (d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Dishaw & Strong, 1999
A positive task-technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) adoption.
“Research Proposition 2 (a-d): A positive task -technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) (a)initiation, (b)adoption, (c)routinization, and (d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Dishaw & Strong, 1999
A positive task-technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) initiation.
“Research Proposition 2 (a-d): A positive task -technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) (a)initiation, (b)adoption, (c)routinization, and (d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Dishaw & Strong, 1999
A positive task-technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) routinization.
“Research Proposition 2 (a-d): A positive task -technology-fit (TTF) environment within an organization is positively related with HRM (AI) (a)initiation, (b)adoption, (c)routinization, and (d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Dishaw & Strong, 1999
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057 · see citing works
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815 · see citing works
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006 · see citing works
Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.63 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458 · see citing works
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovič, A. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research.
University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Davis, F., University of Arkansas, Morris, M., & University of Virginia (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00120 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies
Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K. O., & Benbasat, I. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230210 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT/ITeS organizations
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-04-2020-0186 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.016 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Huang, Y.-W. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch
Wu, L.-H., Wu, L.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Recent related research in technology acceptance model: A literature review
Chen, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Li, C.-Y. (2012) · Australian Journal of Business and Management Research · doi:10.52283/nswrca.ajbmr.20110109a14 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Teo, T. (2010) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.002 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences
Prikshat, V., Malik, A., & Budhwar, P. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100860 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
TSIKNAKIS, M., & KOUROUBALI, A. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.001 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Park, N. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Stewart, G. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231191177 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Kim, T. (., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G. (2010) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.787 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Pan, J., Ding, S., Wu, D., Yang, S., & Yang, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1550272 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811389 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
User acceptance of e-government services: examining an e-tax filing and payment system in Thailand
Bhuasiri, W., Zo, H., Lee, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2016) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2016.1173001 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Adang, L., Vercruysse, J., & Duyck, P. (2008) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me0477 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Acceptance of recommendations to buy in online retailing.
Baier, D., & Stüber, E. (2010) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.03.005 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Limaj, E., Bernroider, E. W. N., & Choudrie, J. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.12.003 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Adoption Factors of FinTech: Evidence from an Emerging Economy Country-Wide Representative Sample
Mahmud, K., Joarder, M. M. A., & Muheymin-Us-Sakib, K. (2022) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs11010009 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Tajudeen Shittu, A., Madarsha Basha, K., Suryani Nik AbdulRahman, N., & Badariah Tunku Ahmad, T. (2011) · Multicultural Education & Technology Journal · doi:10.1108/17504971111166929 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Wang, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101080 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Bile Hassan, I., Murad, M. A. A., El-Shekeil, I., & Liu, J. (2022) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics9020031 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Lee, W., Tyrrell, T., & Erdem, M. (2013) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/17579881311302329 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Horan, T. A., Tulu, B., Hilton, B., & Burton, J. (2004) · 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the · doi:10.1109/hicss.2004.1265364 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Goswami, M., Jain, S., Alam, T., Deifalla, A. F., Ragab, A. E., & Khargotra, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1215706 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Mobile Nursing Information System Utilization: The Task-Technology Fit Perspective
LIN, T.-C. (2014) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000039 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
University of South Alabama, Howard, M. C., Hair, J. F., & University of South Alabama (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00084 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
An Analysis of Factors Affecting User Acceptance of ERP Systems in the United States
Bandyopadhyay, K., & Barnes, C. (2012) · International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals · doi:10.4018/jhcitp.2012010101 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Sun, S., Xiong, C., & Chang, V. (2019) · International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijeis.2019010102 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dishaw, Mark T
- ORCID
- Strong, Diane M
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-21
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098481455
- Cited by
- 1,772
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 36.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, task-technology fit, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, software utilization, user performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review