Cited by 197Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaChild Abuse and Trauma

Intervention Effectiveness among War-Affected Children: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial on Improving Mental Health

Qouta, Samir R., Palosaari, Esa, Diab, Marwan, Punamäki, Raija‐Leena·2012·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention in reducing mental health symptoms among war-affected children, and the role of peritraumatic dissociation in moderating the intervention impact on posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). School classes were randomized into intervention (n = 242) and waitlist control (n = 240) conditions in Gaza, Palestine. The intervention group participated in 16 extracurriculum sessions of teaching recovery techniques (TRT) and the controls received normal school-provided support. Participants were 10- to 13-year-old Palestinian girls (49.4%) and boys (50.6%). Data on PTSS, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress were collected at baseline (T1), postintervention (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3). Peritraumatic dissociation was assessed only at baseline. Regression analyses that took regression to the mean and cluster sampling into account were applied. The results on intervention effectiveness were specific to gender and peritraumatic dissociation. At T2, the intervention significantly reduced the proportion of clinical PTSS among boys, and both the symptom level (R(2) = .24), and proportion of clinical PTSS among girls who had a low level of peritraumatic dissociation. The results have implications for risk-specific tailoring of psychosocial interventions in war conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21707

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qouta, S. R., Palosaari, E., Diab, M., & Punamäki, R.
Affiliations
  • Islamic University of Gaza (PS)
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Punamäki, Raija‐Leena
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-30
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
288-298
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2040355748
Cited by
197
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
war-affected children, posttraumatic stress symptoms, peritraumatic dissociation, psychosocial interventions, Teaching Recovery Techniques, school-based intervention, gender differences, depressive symptoms, psychological distress, Gaza Strip, children in armed conflict, intervention moderators
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle East, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Warfare, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Cluster Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Arabs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review