Cited by 536Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: U.S. Normative Data and Psychometric Properties

Bourdon, Karen H., Goodman, Robert, Rae, Donald S., Simpson, Gloria, Koretz, Doreen S.·2005·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a U.S. national population sample of children and adolescents, develop normative scoring bands, and test the association of high-scoring groups with service contacts or use for mental health reasons.Method An Americanized version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire parent report was administered to parents of 10,367 4- to 17 -year-olds in the 2001 National Health Interview Survey. Scoring bands were developed to differentiate low, medium, and high levels of emotional or behavioral difficulties. Children at high risk of serious difficulties were identified by three different scoring methods: (1) high symptom scores, (2) parental perception of definite or severe difficulties, and (3) high symptoms plus impairment. These ratings were validated against service contact or use and other well-established demographic and broader risk factors for child emotional and behavioral problems.Results Results indicated good acceptability and internal consistency. Normative scoring bands were similar, though not identical, to the original British bands. Results of each scoring method had a strong association with service contact/use.Conclusions This study supports the usefulness of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as an effective and efficient screener for child and adolescent mental health problems in the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.chi.0000159157.57075.c8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourdon, K. H., Goodman, R., Rae, D. S., Simpson, G., & Koretz, D. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bourdon, Karen H.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
557-564
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030124126
Cited by
536
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, child and adolescent mental health, emotional and behavioral problems, reference values, screening, parent report, mental health service utilization, psychometric properties, internal consistency, risk identification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, United States, Utilization Review, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review