Cited by 71Cancer survivorship and carePosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Posttraumatic growth following cancer: Links to quality of life

Open access
Tomich, Patricia L., Helgeson, Vicki S.·2012·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

This study examined the linkage of posttraumatic growth (PTG) to quality of life (QOL) among individuals newly diagnosed with cancer. Individuals (26 men, 36 women) reported PTG 3 months postdiagnosis (T1) and 3 months later (T2). Cross-sectional analyses revealed a linear association between PTG and QOL-more PTG was related to worse mental health at T1 (β = -.28). PTG, however, revealed a quadratic relationship with depressive symptoms at T1 and physical health at T2: Individuals with high or low levels of PTG had fewer depressive symptoms and better QOL than those with moderate levels. Longitudinal analyses revealed a linear association between PTG and QOL; more PTG at T1 predicted better physical health at T2. There were no longitudinal curvilinear associations. Although the linear links of PTG to QOL were contradictory within this study, both of the curvilinear relations, although not robust, confirm previous research. Further analyses differentiated low, medium, and high PTG groups in terms of perceiving cancer as stressful, intrusive thoughts, and coping strategies. Overall, relations of PTG to adjustment may be more complex and dynamic than previously assumed. Clinicians should consider the notion that more growth may sometimes, but not always, be better.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21738

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Tomich, Patricia L.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
567-573
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1916103335
Cited by
71
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca079752-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA79752)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, cancer, quality of life, depressive symptoms, physical health, mental health, cancer diagnosis, coping strategies, intrusive thoughts, perceived stress, psychological adjustment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review