Cited by 248Cancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingWomen's cancer prevention and management

Curvilinear associations between benefit finding and psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer.

Lechner, Suzanne C., Carver, Charles S., Antoni, Michael H., Weaver, Kathryn E., Phillips, Kristin M.·2006·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Two previously studied cohorts of women with nonmetastatic breast cancer (Ns = 230 and 136) were reexamined. Participants were assessed during the year after surgery and 5-8 years later. Associations were examined between benefit finding (BF) and several indicators of psychosocial adjustment (e.g., perceived quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, social disruption, and intrusive thoughts). Significant curvilinear relations between BF and other outcomes were observed cross-sectionally during initial assessment and at long-term follow-up in both samples. Compared with the intermediate BF group, low and high BF groups had better psychosocial adjustment. Further analyses indicated that the high BF group reported higher optimism and more use of positive reframing and religious coping than the other BF groups. Discussion highlights the need to examine nonlinear as well as linear relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.74.5.828

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lechner, S. C., Carver, C. S., Antoni, M. H., Weaver, K. E., & Phillips, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2006-10
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
828-840
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2101483527
Cited by
248
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R03CA113096; R01CA64710)
  • American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
benefit finding, breast cancer, psychosocial adjustment, curvilinear relationship, nonlinear relationship, quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, social disruption, intrusive thoughts, optimism, positive reframing, religious coping, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review