Cited by 2,260Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review

Linley, P. Alex, Joseph, Stephen·2004·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Empirical studies ( n = 39) that documented positive change following trauma and adversity (e.g., posttraumatic growth, stress‐related growth, perceived benefit, thriving; collectively described as adversarial growth) were reviewed. The review indicated that cognitive appraisal variables (threat, harm, and controllability), problem‐focused, acceptance and positive reinterpretation coping, optimism, religion, cognitive processing, and positive affect were consistently associated with adversarial growth. The review revealed inconsistent associations between adversarial growth, sociodemographic variables (gender, age, education, and income), and psychological distress variables (e.g., depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder). However, the evidence showed that people who reported and maintained adversarial growth over time were less distressed subsequently. Methodological limitations and recommended future directions in adversarial growth research are discussed, and the implications of adversarial growth for clinical practice are briefly considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jots.0000014671.27856.7e

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Linley, P. Alex
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1997405750
Cited by
2,260
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 124
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Warwick
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
adversarial growth, posttraumatic growth, stress-related growth, perceived benefits, thriving, trauma, adversity, cognitive appraisal, threat appraisal, controllability, problem-focused coping, acceptance and commitment therapy, positive reappraisal, optimism, positive affect, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, sociodemographic factors, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude, Depression, Humans, Problem Solving, Psychology, Religion and Psychology, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review