Cited by 480Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Dangerous Safe Havens: Institutional Betrayal Exacerbates Sexual Trauma

Smith, Carly Parnitzke, Freyd, Jennifer J.·2013·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Research has documented the profound negative impact of betrayal within experiences of interpersonal trauma such as sexual assault (Freyd, 1994, 1996; Freyd, DePrince, & Gleaves, 2007). In the current study of college women (N = 345, 79% Caucasian; mean age = 19.69 years, SD = 2.55), we examined whether institutional failure to prevent sexual assault or respond supportively when it occurs may similarly exacerbate posttraumatic symptomatology-what we call "institutional betrayal." Almost half (47%) of the women reported at least one coercive sexual experience and another 21% reported no coercion, but at least one unwanted sexual experience (total reporting unwanted sexual experiences, N = 233). Institutional betrayal (e.g., creating an environment where these experiences seemed more likely, making it difficult to report these experiences) was reported across different unwanted sexual experiences (47% and 45% of women reporting coercion and no coercion, respectively). Those women who reported institutional betrayal surrounding their unwanted sexual experience reported increased levels of anxiety (R(2) = .10), trauma-specific sexual symptoms (R(2) = .17), dissociation (R(2) = .11), and problematic sexual functioning (R(2) = .12). These results suggest that institutions have the power to cause additional harm to assault survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21778

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of support exacerbates trauma and is a form of institutional betrayal.

    “Post-secondary school scholars find that lack of support also exacerbates trauma and call it a form of institutional betrayal (Smith and Freyd 2013) though this conceptual framework has yet to be applied to the study of digital harms in secondary schools.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Carly Parnitzke
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
119-124
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W1904168428
Cited by
480
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
33.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
institutional betrayal, sexual trauma, sexual assault, female university students, unwanted sexual experiences, sexual coercion, posttraumatic stress symptoms, anxiety, dissociation, institutional failure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Coercion, Dangerous Behavior, Dissociative Disorders, Ethics, Institutional, Humans, Deception, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rape, Risk Factors, Safety, Sex Offenses, Sleep Wake Disorders, Social Environment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Students, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review