Cited by 50Military, Security, and Education StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMemory, violence, and history

Government-mandated institutional betrayal

Open access
Smidt, Alec M., Freyd, Jennifer J.·2018·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

This editorial opens the final issue of Volume 19 of the Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (JTD). As Smith & Freyd noted in 2014, the work of this journal is highly collaborative and involves many p...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2018.1502029

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The label betrayal scale reflects the type of distress commonly experienced when individuals are harmed by deliberate acts of omission or perpetration by the institutions upon which they rely for support, protection, or even survival.

    “The label betrayal scale was chosen because it reflects the type of distress commonly experienced (anger, anxiety, anguish, and so on) when individuals are harmed by deliberate acts of omission or perpetration by the institutions upon which they rely for support, protection, or even survival. 30”

    From Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

    The paper’s “Government-mandated institutional betrayal” section (page unavailable) defines institutional betrayal as deliberate acts or omissions by institutions on which people rely for support, protection, and sometimes survival. It discusses traumatic harm in a specific example, but does not establish that anger, anxiety, and anguish are commonly experienced responses to institutional betrayal. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S125885 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smidt, A. M., & Freyd, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Smidt, Alec M.
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
491-499
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2886736851
Cited by
50
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
institutional betrayal, government mandates, trauma, dissociation, research ethics
MeSH terms
Gender Identity, Humans, Malpractice, Periodicals as Topic, Refugees, Social Justice, United States, Organizational Culture, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review