Cited by 6Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMigration, Health and Trauma

The end of the trial: Perspectives on cognitive processing therapy from community-based providers in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Open access
Lakin, Daniel P., Murray, Sarah M., Lasater, Molly E., Kaysen, Debra, Mataboro, Amani, Annan, Jeannie, Bolton, Paul, Bass, Judith K.·2022·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Despite calls forincreased mental health programming in low-resource and humanitarian contexts and effectiveness trials of psychotherapy in these settings, little research exists on the extent to which providers and recipients continue to practice skills learned during trials of these programs. To understand if and how providers continued to use mental health intervention skills without ongoing institutional support following the completion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we analyzed data from semistructured interviews with six of seven providers who participated in an RCT of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in the Democratic Republic of Congo 7 years prior. Provider interviews revealed continued knowledge of and, in some cases, the practice of core CPT skills as well as efforts to keep meeting with women in the community and a strong desire to learn new skills. Although financial limitations sometimes prohibited providers from formally convening CPT groups with women in need, participants maintained knowledge and skill use. Providers also reported feeling more valued in their communities, and they continued providing services beyond the planned intervention period despite a lack of ongoing support. In addition, participants described a strong desire to continue psychosocial interventions for trauma and learn more about this type of intervention. Reframing the evaluation of psychological interventions as program development and maintaining a strong working relationship with community partners may allow for increased sustainability of mental health services beyond the end of academic research studies in low-resource contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22734

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a qualitative investigation from the same four-year follow-up study, practitioners retained cognitive processing therapy skills and maintained cognitive processing therapy groups with new clients despite a lack of institutional support and clinical oversight.

    “In a qualitative investigation from the same four-year follow-up study [27], practitioners retained CPT skills and maintained CPT groups with new clients despite a lack of institutional support and clinical oversight, indicating some degree of sustainability with limited resources.”

    From Psychological Interventions for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence in Humanitarian Settings: An Overview of the Evidence and Implementation Considerations (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakin, D. P., Murray, S. M., Lasater, M. E., Kaysen, D., Mataboro, A., Annan, J., Bolton, P., & Bass, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Action Kivu, Bukavu, South Kivu Democratic Republic of Congo
  • International Rescue Committee (US)
Corresponding author
Lakin, Daniel P.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
269-277
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W3206950830
Cited by
6
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
cognitive processing therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, resource-limited settings, humanitarian settings, trauma-focused psychotherapy, program development, community partnerships, provider motivation, Democratic Republic of the Congo
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review