Cited by 1,289Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys

Open access
Andrade, L. H., Alonso, J., Mneimneh, Z., Wells, J. E., Al-Hamzawi, A., Borges, G., Bromet, E., Bruffaerts, R. +23 more·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: To examine barriers to initiation and continuation of mental health treatment among individuals with common mental disorders. Method: Data were from the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Representative household samples were interviewed face to face in 24 countries. Reasons to initiate and continue treatment were examined in a subsample ( n = 636 78) and analyzed at different levels of clinical severity. Results: Among those with a DSM-IV disorder in the past 12 months, low perceived need was the most common reason for not initiating treatment and more common among moderate and mild than severe cases. Women and younger people with disorders were more likely to recognize a need for treatment. A desire to handle the problem on one's own was the most common barrier among respondents with a disorder who perceived a need for treatment (63.8%). Attitudinal barriers were much more important than structural barriers to both initiating and continuing treatment. However, attitudinal barriers dominated for mild-moderate cases and structural barriers for severe cases. Perceived ineffectiveness of treatment was the most commonly reported reason for treatment drop-out (39.3%), followed by negative experiences with treatment providers (26.9% of respondents with severe disorders). Conclusions: Low perceived need and attitudinal barriers are the major barriers to seeking and staying in treatment among individuals with common mental disorders worldwide. Apart from targeting structural barriers, mainly in countries with poor resources, increasing population mental health literacy is an important endeavor worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291713001943

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disorder characteristics are known to predict treatment.

    “these disorder characteristics are known to predict treatment (Andrade et al. 2014)”

    From Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys (2018) · cites this paper as Andrade et al. 2014

    The Results (page not supplied) show that disorder severity is associated with perceived need for treatment and with reported barriers to seeking it. The paper does not establish that disorder characteristics predict whether someone actually receives treatment; its regression models examine barriers rather than treatment receipt. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Barriers for the dissemination of MBIs are similar to those facing other evidence-based psychotherapies (eg, lack of available providers, cost, logistical challenges).

    “Barriers for the dissemination of MBIs are similar to those facing other evidence-based psychotherapies (eg, lack of available providers, cost, logistical challenges) [23-25].”

    From Testing the efficacy of a multicomponent, self-guided, smartphone-based meditation app: Three-armed randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results (Barriers to seeking treatment; page unavailable) identify financial barriers and lack of availability, while the Introduction describes inconvenient locations and difficulty obtaining appointments. The paper studies mental health treatment broadly; it does not establish that these barriers are similar for MBIs and other evidence-based psychotherapies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A digital therapeutic tool has the potential to increase accessibility and availability of treatment for GAD by reducing barriers such as waiting times, perceived stigma, geographical distance, financial costs, and lack of time.

    “A digital therapeutic tool has the potential to increase accessibility and availability of treatment for those suffering with GAD by reducing barriers such as waiting times before treatment [7], perceived stigma [8,9], geographical distance, financial costs, and lack of time due to, for example, work commitments or caring responsibilities [10].”

    From Development and feasibility of a digital acceptance and commitment therapy⇓based intervention for generalized anxiety disorder: Pilot acceptability study (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies geographic distance, financial problems, and time barriers to seeking mental health treatment, supporting the barriers attached to citation [10]. The paper groups mental disorders rather than assessing GAD-specific barriers, and the passages do not establish work or caring responsibilities as reasons for the time barrier. Waiting times and stigma are attached to other citations in the sentence; this paper does not test whether a digital tool reduces any of these barriers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lack of access to services and limited mobility are reasons older people do not receive adequate care.

    “This is due to the lack of access to those services (Andrade et al . 2014; Gamm et al . 2010) and limited mobility (Wetherell et al . 2004).”

    From Effectiveness of a training programme based on acceptance and commitment therapy aimed at older adults – no moderating role of cognitive functioning (2021) · cites this paper as Andrade et al . 2014

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies service availability and accessibility as barriers to mental health treatment, supporting the lack-of-access portion attributed to Andrade et al. The Results report that structural barriers were more common among the youngest than the oldest respondents, so the paper does not establish lack of access specifically as a reason older people miss care. Limited mobility is attributed to Wetherell et al. in the citing sentence, not to Andrade et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional face-to-face psychotherapies, including DBT, usually carry high economic costs and personal barriers that may prevent youth from accessing them.

    “Traditional face-to-face psychotherapies, including DBT, usually carry high economic costs and personal barriers that may prevent youth from accessing them [20].”

    From A mobile health intervention (LifeBuoy App) to help young people manage suicidal thoughts: protocol for a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Correlates of barriers to treatment; page not provided) report that younger respondents were more likely to encounter structural barriers. The Discussion (page not provided) identifies possible financial and time barriers for younger respondents. The paper addresses mental-health treatment generally, not the costs of face-to-face psychotherapy or DBT specifically, and its younger respondents are not identified as youth. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association 2006 American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Compendium American Psychiatric Association Press Arlington, VA
  2. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-Patient Edition (SCID-I/NP) Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrade, L. H., Alonso, J., Mneimneh, Z., Wells, J. E., Al-Hamzawi, A., Borges, G., Bromet, E., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Florescu, S., Gureje, O., Hinkov, H. R., Hu, C., Huang, Y., Hwang, I., Jin, R., Karam, E. G., Kovess-Masfety, V., Levinson, D., Matschinger, H., O'Neill, S., Posada-Villa, J., Sagar, R., Sampson, N. A., Sasu, C., Stein, D. J., Takeshima, T., Viana, M. C., Xavier, M., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research (ES)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Al-Qadisiyah (IQ)
  • Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (MX)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development (RO)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • National Center of Public Health and Analyses (BG)
  • Shenzhen KangNing Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
  • Saint George Hospital (LB)
  • Israel Ministry of Health (IL)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Kessler, R. C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2013-08-09
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1303-1317
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2100695323
Cited by
1,289
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
36.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency (RES/4792/13)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r13mh066849-04, 5r01mh069864-04, 5r01mh070884-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R13-MH-066849, R0 1-MH61905, R01‐MH070884, U01-MH-60220, R01MH061905, U01MH060220, R01‐MH069864)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05DA015799, R01DA016558)
  • Fogarty International Center (R03TW006481)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
barriers to mental health care, common mental disorders, help-seeking, treatment initiation, treatment discontinuation, perceived need for treatment, attitudinal barriers, structural barriers, mental health literacy, clinical severity, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Global Health, World Health Organization, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review